Literature DB >> 12049241

Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Tracy L Brown1, Christopher L Gore, Thomas H Carr.   

Abstract

In Stroop color naming, color targets were accompanied by a color word or a color word plus a neutral word that reduces or "dilutes" the Stroop effect. Abrupt-onset cues called the focus of attention to one stimulus or another. Cuing influenced the size of the Stroop effect but never eliminated it. Unlike the Stroop effect itself, Stroop dilution from the neutral word could be eliminated, by cuing the color word. Focusing visual attention on the color word protected it from Stroop dilution; focusing visual attention on the neutral word did not prevent Stroop interference. Thus, spatial attention is a modulator, protecting visual data from crosstalk, but a word need not be the focus of visual attention to be recognized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12049241     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.2.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  36 in total

1.  Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

2.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; Paul N Russell; Martin J Dorahy; Ewald Neumann; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

5.  Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Valentin Flaudias; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

6.  Novel Symbol Learning-Induced Stroop Effect: Evidence for a Strategy-Based, Utility Learning Model.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Huijun Tang; Yuan Deng
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

7.  The perceptual processing capacity of summary statistics between and within feature dimensions.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.

Authors:  Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Martina Weltle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

10.  Hierarchical number estimation.

Authors:  Jay Friedenberg; William Limratana
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.