Literature DB >> 12199318

What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

D Besner1, J A Stolz.   

Abstract

An intersection of three literatures (skilled word recognition, spatial attention, and the Stroop effect) is addressed in a series of four experiments. The results, in conjunction with other observations, are taken to suggest that (1) the default value for spatial attention in visual word recognition is distributed across the word, (2) precuing a single letter position serves to narrow the focus of spatial attention, and (3) this reduces or prevents activation in the word recognition system. Consequently, the Stroop effect is reduced in magnitude or eliminated, depending on details of the context. Contrary to the widespread view that it reflects automatic processing, the Stroop effect is better conceptualized as reflecting the action of default settings in the word recognition and attentional systems. Some relations between consciousness, context, and control are noted.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12199318     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

2.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; C L Folk; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing.

Authors:  J A Stolz; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  Perception of letters in words: seek not and ye shall find.

Authors:  J C Johnston; J L McClelland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08

8.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Selective and divided Attention in a Stroop task.

Authors:  D G Lowe; J O Mitterer
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-12
  10 in total
  23 in total

1.  Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: parallel encoding of chess relations.

Authors:  E M Reingold; N Charness; R S Schultetus; D M Stampe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.

Authors:  D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Working memory and stroop interference: an individual differences investigation.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

4.  The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Avishai Henik; Idit Spitzer-Davidson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

5.  Stroop interference effects in partially colored Stroop words.

Authors:  Shai Danziger; Angeles F Estévez; Paloma Marí-Beffa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

6.  Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

7.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

8.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

9.  Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Valentin Flaudias; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

10.  Case mixing and the right parietal cortex: evidence from rTMS.

Authors:  W Braet; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.