Literature DB >> 10829164

Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning.

F S Haddad1, B A Masri, D S Garbuz, C P Duncan.   

Abstract

A single comprehensive classification system that can adequately describe all types of bone loss associated with hip arthroplasty should become a standard for reporting purposes. There is a need for a critical appraisal of the classification systems currently in use and, through a consensus, for development of a system that will permit comparison between the reported results of different techniques. Although no one classification system is ideal, the one proposed by the AAOS Committee on the Hip is the most comprehensive and the most consistently used. It addresses not only revision total hip arthroplasty but also primary hip replacement. It also addresses other conditions related to problems with the bone stock, such as those resulting from a previous hip arthrodesis on the acetabular side and femoral stenosis and malalignment on the femoral side. The only drawback to this classification system is its complexity; however, the problem of acetabular and femoral bone loss is of sufficient complexity and variety that a simple classification system, although ideal, cannot be comprehensive. Regardless of the absence of a common language and a comprehensive classification system that is applicable to all types of reconstructions, it is clear that femoral bone loss is a problem that will continue to challenge orthopaedic surgeons. It is only by careful and methodical analysis of patients who have femoral bone loss and by meticulous attention being paid to detail in preoperative evaluation and investigation, surgical planning, and the recording of outcomes that we will be able to improve our treatment of this difficult problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10829164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  15 in total

1.  [Revision hip stems: an analysis of the fixation].

Authors:  M Thomsen; J P Kretzer; C Heisel; C Lee; J Nadorf; E Jakubowitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  To what degree is digital imaging reliable? Validation of femoral neck shaft angle measurement in the era of picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  J D Wilson; W Eardley; S Odak; A Jennings
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of techniques for correction of magnification of pelvic X-rays for hip surgery planning.

Authors:  Bertram The; Johan W J Kootstra; Anton H Hosman; Nico Verdonschot; Carina L E Gerritsma; Ron L Diercks
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Marc N Thomsen; Christian Heisel; Alexander Jahnke; Jan P Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Revision arthroplasty: an update.

Authors:  D Williams; A Taylor; P McLardy-Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  [Alloarthroplasty versus above-knee amputation].

Authors:  K Daniilidis; E Jakubowitz; C Stukenborg-Colsman; T Calließ; H Windhagen; D Yao
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Classifications In Brief: The Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss.

Authors:  David A Ibrahim; Navin D Fernando
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Marc N Thomsen; Jan Nadorf; Christian Heisel; Michael C Tanner; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Quality of life following proximal femoral replacement using a modular system in revision THA.

Authors:  Muhyeddine M Al-Taki; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  High complication rate in revision total hip arthroplasty in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Katherine Hwang; Susanna Imrie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.