Literature DB >> 23011721

Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Hagen Andruszkow1, Michael Frink, Cornelia Frömke, Amir Matityahu, Christian Zeckey, Philipp Mommsen, Stefanie Suntardjo, Christian Krettek, Frank Hildebrand.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the quality of osteosynthesis after intertrochanteric fractures evaluation of tip apex distance (TAD) and position of the hip screw have been established. Furthermore, a slightly valgus fracture reduction has been suggested to reduce the risk of cut-out failure. However, uniform recommendations for optimal screw positioning and fracture reduction are still missing. The purpose of our study was to confirm potential risk factors for cut-out of hip screws of intertrochanteric fractures and to provide recommendations for practical clinical use.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with a DHS or a gamma nail between January of 2007 and May of 2010 was performed at a level I trauma center.
RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five patients with intertrochanteric fractures after intra- and extramedullary stabilization were analyzed. A TAD of more than 25 mm was demonstrated to be the most important factor for cut-out in stable and unstable fractures. Fracture reduction with a valgus NSA of 5-10° was associated with a trend towards a lower rate of screw cut-out while an anterior placement of the screw (Parker's ratio index of <40) significantly increased cut-out incidence.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the TAD should not exceed 25 mm in stable (AO/OTA A1) as well as unstable (AO/OTA A2) fractures. An increased anterior hip screw placement should be avoided while fracture reduction with a slight valgus Neck Shaft seems favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23011721      PMCID: PMC3479298          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1636-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  M Güven; U Yavuz; B Kadioğlu; B Akman; V Kilinçoğlu; K Unay; F Altintaş
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  Societal consequences of falls in the older population: injuries, healthcare costs, and long-term reduced quality of life.

Authors:  Klaas A Hartholt; Ed F van Beeck; Suzanne Polinder; Nathalie van der Velde; Esther M M van Lieshout; Martien J M Panneman; Tischa J M van der Cammen; Peter Patka
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-09

3.  A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Tristan M Barton; Robert Gleeson; Claire Topliss; Rosemary Greenwood; William J Harries; Timothy J S Chesser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Femoral neck-shaft angle in extra-capsular proximal femoral fracture fixation; does it make a TAD of difference?

Authors:  N P Walton; H Wynn-Jones; M S Ward; J A Wimhurst
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Accuracy of in situ neck-shaft angle and shortening measurements of the anatomically reduced, varus malreduced and shortened proximal femur: can we believe what we see on the postoperative films?

Authors:  Meir Marmor; Christopher Nystuen; Nathan Ehemer; R Trigg McClellan; Amir Matityahu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Praveen Mereddy; Sri Kamath; Muthukrishnan Ramakrishnan; Hamad Malik; Nigel Donnachie
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Anglen; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Geller; Comron Saifi; Todd A Morrison; William Macaulay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Is a sliding hip screw or im nail the preferred implant for intertrochanteric fracture fixation?

Authors:  Brian Aros; Anna N A Tosteson; Daniel J Gottlieb; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  36 in total

1.  The neck shaft angle: CT reference values of 800 adult hips.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Janine Jostmeier; Johannes Oppermann; Jens Dargel; De-Hua Chang; Peer Eysel; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis on functional outcome after trochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Benjamin Buecking; Tim Schwarting; Florian Debus; Steffen Ruchholtz; Christoph Bliemel; Michael Frink; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A novel technique for the fixation of inter-trochantieric hip fractures: A telescoping lag screw.

Authors:  Devin M Jagow; Shahan V Yacoubian; Edward J McCrink; Stephan V Yacoubian
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-08

4.  Arthroplasty for unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures may offer a lower re-operation rate as compared to cephalomedullary nailing.

Authors:  Simcha G Fichman; Tatu J Mäkinen; Oleg Safir; Alex Vincent; Benjamin Lozano; Aidin Kashigar; Paul R T Kuzyk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

6.  Which AO/OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures can be treated with a dynamic hip screw without developing a lateral wall fracture? A CT-based study.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Ravijot Singh; Kiran Kumar Gn; Vaibhav Jain; Ankit Gupta; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Kamran Farooque; Vijay Sharma
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Failure of short versus long cephalomedullary nail after intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Pernille Engell Bovbjerg; Morten Schultz Larsen; Carsten Fladmose Madsen; Jesper Schønnemann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

8.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  Ioannis Aktselis; Constantine Kokoroghiannis; Evaggelos Fragkomichalos; Georgios Koundis; Anastasios Deligeorgis; Emmanouil Daskalakis; John Vlamis; Nikolaos Papaioannou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Radiographic quantification of dynamic hip screw migration.

Authors:  Laurent Audigé; Flurin Cagienard; Christoph Martin Sprecher; Norbert Suhm; Marc Andreas Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System.

Authors:  R Pascarella; R Fantasia; A Maresca; C Bettuzzi; L Amendola; S Violini; F Cuoghi; P Sangiovanni; S Cerbasi; S Boriani; D S Tigani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.