Literature DB >> 21110100

320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose.

Chuanchen Zhang1, Zhaoqi Zhang, Zixu Yan, Lei Xu, Wei Yu, Rui Wang.   

Abstract

To prospectively evaluate image quality parameters, contrast volume and radiation dose at the 100-kilovolt (kV) setting during coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) on a 320-row computed tomography scanner. We enrolled 107 consecutive patients with a heart rate <65 beats per minute (bpm) undergoing prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered CCTA. Forty patients with a body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m(2) were scanned using 100-kV tube voltage settings, while 67 patients were scanned using 120-kV protocols. Image quality was assessed by two readers unaware of patient information and scan parameters. Attenuation in the aorta and perivascular fat tissue and image noise were measured. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) and contrast material volumes were calculated. The effective radiation doses were estimated using a chest conversion coefficient (0.017). Diagnostic image quality was achieved in 98.2% of coronary segments with 100-kV CCTA and 98.6% of coronary segments with 120-kV CCTA, with no significant differences in image quality scores for each coronary segment. Vessel attenuation, image noise, and CNR were not significantly different between the 100- and 120-kV protocols. Mean contrast injection rate and mean material volume were significantly lower for the 100-kV CCTA (4.35 ± 0.28 ml/s and 53.13 ± 3.77 ml, respectively) than for the 120-kV CCTA (5.16 ± 0.21 ml/s and 62.40 ± 3.66 ml respectively; P < 0.001). The effective radiation dose was 2.12 ± 0.19 mSv for 100-kV CCTA, a reduction of 54% compared to 4.61 ± 0.82 mSv for 120-kV CCTA. A 100-kV CCTA can be implemented in patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m(2). The 100-kV setting allows significant reductions in contrast material volume and effective radiation dose while maintaining adequate diagnostic image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110100     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9754-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  39 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Conversion factor for CT dosimetry to assess patient dose using a 256-slice CT scanner.

Authors:  S Mori; K Nishizawa; M Ohno; M Endo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing.

Authors:  Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Andre Plass; Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Lars Husmann; Thomas G Flohr; Michele Genoni; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of volumetric CT scanning?

Authors:  Szilard Voros
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2009-01-09

Review 6.  IV contrast infusion for coronary artery CT angiography: literature review and results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; Harpreet K Pannu; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Pediatric cardiovascular CT angiography: radiation dose reduction using automatic anatomic tube current modulation.

Authors:  Christopher Herzog; Denise M Mulvihill; Shaun A Nguyen; Giancarlo Savino; Bernhard Schmidt; Philip Costello; Thomas J Vogl; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Coronary calcification: Achilles' heel in the assessment for coronary artery disease in patients with symptomatic angina?

Authors:  John N Makaryus; Amgad N Makaryus
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Medical imaging: the radiation issue.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose.

Authors:  Stephan Baumüller; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Burkhardt Seifert; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  20 in total

1.  Subtraction coronary CT angiography using second-generation 320-detector row CT.

Authors:  Kunihiro Yoshioka; Ryoichi Tanaka; Kenta Muranaka; Tadashi Sasaki; Takanori Ueda; Takuya Chiba; Kouta Takeda; Tsuyoshi Sugawara
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Radiation dose exposure of patients undergoing 320-row cardiac CT for assessing coronary angiography and global left ventricular function.

Authors:  Chien-Ming Chen; Yuan-Chang Liu; Chun-Chi Chen; Ming-Shien Wen; Chien-Fu Hung; Yung-Liang Wan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Potential role of three-dimensional rotational angiography and C-arm CT for valvular repair and implantation.

Authors:  Jonathan G Schwartz; Anne M Neubauer; Thomas E Fagan; Niels J Noordhoek; Michael Grass; John D Carroll
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the whole aorta without ECG synchronisation: initial experience.

Authors:  Martin Beeres; Boris Schell; Aristidis Mastragelopoulos; Eva Herrmann; Josef Matthias Kerl; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Clara Lee; Petra Siebenhandl; Boris Bodelle; Stephan Zangos; Thomas J Vogl; Volkmar Jacobi; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  F Pelliccia; V Pasceri; A Evangelista; A Pergolini; F Barillà; N Viceconte; G Tanzilli; M Schiariti; C Greco; C Gaudio
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Li Qi; Jing Wang; Chun Xiang Tang; Chang Sheng Zhou; Xue Man Ji; James V Spearman; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Minimizing the acquisition phase in coronary CT angiography using the second generation 320-row CT.

Authors:  Nobuo Tomizawa; Shigeaki Kanno; Eriko Maeda; Masaaki Akahane; Rumiko Torigoe; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  320-row coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with automatic exposure control (AEC): effect of 100 kV versus 120 kV on image quality and dose exposure.

Authors:  Ernesto Di Cesare; Antonio Gennarelli; Alessandra Di Sibio; Valentina Felli; Marco Perri; Alessandra Splendiani; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  Low tube voltage prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography: a systematic review of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Sock Keow Tan; Chai Hong Yeong; Raja Rizal Azman Raja Aman; Kwan Hoong Ng; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Kok Han Chee; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.