Literature DB >> 24282694

Coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

Zhonghua Sun1.   

Abstract

Despite the tremendous contributions of coronary CT angiography to coronary artery disease, radiation dose associated with coronary CT angiography has raised serious concerns in the literature, as the risk of developing radiation-induced malignancy is not negligible. Various dose-saving strategies have been implemented, with some of the strategies resulting in significant dose reduction. Of these strategies, prospective ECG-triggering is one of the most effective techniques with resultant effective radiation dose similar to or even lower than that of invasive coronary angiography. Prospective ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography has been reported to have high diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease with image quality comparable to that of retrospective ECG-gating, but with significantly reduced radiation dose. Successful performance of prospective ECG-triggering is determined by strict exclusion criteria and careful patient preparation. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the diagnostic applications of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering with focus on radiation dose reduction. Radiation dose measurements are discussed with aim of allowing accurate dose estimation. Diagnostic value of prospective ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography in patients with different heart rate is discussed. Finally, current status and future directions are highlighted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; coronary CT angiography; image quality; prospective ECG-triggering; radiation dose

Year:  2012        PMID: 24282694      PMCID: PMC3839169          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2012.02.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  53 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part III: radiation risk and dose reduction.

Authors:  Z Sun; K H Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Dose and image quality comparison between prospectively gated axial and retrospectively gated helical coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  C Hlaihel; L Boussel; H Cochet; J A Roch; P Coulon; M J Walker; P C Douek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Carl D Elliston; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen; Richard Mather; Gregory D N Pearson; Robert L Delapaz; Edward Nickoloff; Ajoy Dutta; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

7.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Piet K Vanhoenacker; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Ruben Van Heste; Isabel Decramer; Lieven R Van Hoe; William Wijns; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  B A Herzog; C A Wyss; L Husmann; O Gaemperli; I Valenta; V Treyer; U Landmesser; P A Kaufmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering on different heart rate patients.

Authors:  Ming-Li Sun; Bin Lu; Run-Ze Wu; Laura Johnson; Lei Han; Gang Liu; Fang-Fang Yu; Zhi-Hui Hou; Yang Gao; Hong-Yu Wang; Shiliang Jiang; Yue-Jin Yang; Shu-Bin Qiao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effect of padding duration on radiation dose and image interpretation in prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Troy M Labounty; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min; Brett Heilbron; G B John Mancini; Fay Y Lin; James P Earls
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  6 in total

1.  'Longitudinal' topics in Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy (CDT).

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Hussain Isma'eel; Ana Olga Mocumbi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

2.  Pyrroloquinoline quinone inhibits oxygen/glucose deprivation-induced apoptosis by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway in cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Haixia Yu; Jinyao Liu; Lu Cheng
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Seismocardiography-Based Cardiac Computed Tomography Gating Using Patient-Specific Template Identification and Detection.

Authors:  Jingting Yao; Srini Tridandapani; Carson A Wick; Pamela T Bhatti
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 4.  Multimodality Imaging for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Severity Grading: A Methodological Review.

Authors:  Maaike Alkema; Ernest Spitzer; Osama I I Soliman; Christian Loewe
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-12-28

Review 5.  Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging.

Authors:  Michael Y Henein; Sergio Vancheri; Gani Bajraktari; Federico Vancheri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24

6.  Detection of the intimal tear in aortic dissection and ulcer-like projection in intramural hematoma: usefulness of full-phase retrospective ECG-gated CT angiography.

Authors:  Satoru Yanagaki; Takuya Ueda; Atsuro Masuda; Hideki Ota; Yuta Onaka; Masatoshi Kojima; Takashi Hattori; Wahei Mihara; Kei Takase
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.