Literature DB >> 21057975

Genetic testing likelihood: the impact of abortion views and quality of life information on women's decisions.

Jessica L Wilson1, Gail M Ferguson, Judith M Thorn.   

Abstract

Little is known about factors predicting the likelihood of choosing genetic testing in college aged women versus older women, including knowledge of quality of life (QOL) associated with a disorder. Using vignettes with female college students (Experiment 1: n=257, mean age=19.70 yrs) and female faculty/staff/alumni (Experiment 2: n (nulliparous)=83, mean age=30.20 yrs; n (mothers)=53, mean age=33.77 yrs), we examined the contribution of multiple factors to predicting genetic testing likelihood for cystic fibrosis. We investigated malleable situational factors (style of genetic risk presentation and providing QOL information including physical and social aspects) and stable dispositional factors (abortion views). Parity (i.e., prior births) was more influential in women's genetic testing likelihood than was age. Greater acceptability of abortion for oneself and self-assessed knowledge following QOL information were predictors of higher testing likelihood for college students. Greater acceptability of abortion for another person was a predictor for nulliparous women. Abortion views moderated the effect of predictors for nulliparous women and mothers. Findings encourage genetic counselors to utilize QOL information to promote informed decision making through genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21057975     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9335-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  35 in total

1.  Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Shrikant I Bangdiwala
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S Loader; P Caldwell; A Kozyra; J C Levenkron; C D Boehm; H H Kazazian; P T Rowley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Beth Potter; Heather Howley; Mario Cappelli; Doug Coyle; Ian Graham; Mark Walker; Brenda Wilson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03

4.  Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: test acceptance and one year follow-up.

Authors:  J C Levenkron; S Loader; P T Rowley
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-12-31

5.  'Because of the risks': how US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening.

Authors:  S Markens; C H Browner; N Press
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  The motherhood choice: a decision aid for women with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Martine C Prunty; Louise Sharpe; Phyllis Butow; Gary Fulcher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-12-21

7.  Informed consent or institutionalized eugenics? How the medical profession encourages abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Darrin P Dixon
Journal:  Issues Law Med       Date:  2008

8.  Declining an alpha-fetoprotein test in pregnancy, why and who?

Authors:  F S Jørgensen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.

Authors:  Carmen Keller; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 10.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M Green; J Hewison; H L Bekker; L D Bryant; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.

Authors:  Katherine F Wright; Louise D Bryant; Stephen Morley; Jenny Hewison; Alistair J A Duff; Daniel Peckham
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.377

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.