Literature DB >> 8659530

Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.

S Loader1, P Caldwell, A Kozyra, J C Levenkron, C D Boehm, H H Kazazian, P T Rowley.   

Abstract

To determine the receptivity of prenatal care providers and their patients to carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF), we offered free carrier screening, followed by genetic counseling of carriers, to all prenatal care providers in Rochester, NY, for all their female patients of reproductive age, pregnant or not. Of 124 prenatal care providers, only 37 elected to participate, but many of these offered screening only to pregnant women. The acceptance rate among pregnant women was approximately 57%. The most common reasons for accepting screening were to obtain reassurance (50.7%) and to avoid having a child with CF (27.8 %). The most common reasons for declining screening were not intending to terminate a pregnancy for CF (32.4%) and believing that the chance of having a CF child was very low (32.2%). Compared with decliners, acceptors were more likely to have no children, regarded having a child with CF as more serious, believed themselves more susceptible to having such a child, knew more about CF, would be more likely to terminate a pregnancy if the fetus were shown to have CF, and more strongly supported offering CF screening to women of reproductive age. Of 4,879 women on whom results were obtained, 124 were found to be carriers. Of these 124 carriers, the partners of 106 were tested. Of the five at-risk couples, four requested prenatal diagnosis and one requested neonatal diagnosis. No woman found to be a carrier whose partner tested negative requested prenatal diagnosis. Except for the imperfect knowledge of those testing negative, none of the adverse outcomes predicted for CF carrier testing in the general population were observed in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Rochester (New York)

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8659530      PMCID: PMC1915087     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  41 in total

1.  Psychological and social consequences of community carrier screening programme for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  E K Watson; E S Mayall; J Lamb; J Chapple; R Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-25       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Cystic fibrosis screening and community genetics.

Authors:  B Modell
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Screening for cystic fibrosis. Ethical and social issues.

Authors:  E Kerem; A Lynch
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-03

4.  Cystic fibrosis carrier screening by DNA analysis: a pilot study of attitudes among participants.

Authors:  F Kaplan; C Clow; C R Scriver
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  General population screening for cystic fibrosis is premature.

Authors:  L Biesecker; B Bowles-Biesecker; F Collins; M Kaback; B Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The ethics of cystic fibrosis carrier screening: where do we stand?

Authors:  M De Braekeleer; M J Mélançon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Prenatal cystic fibrosis carrier testing: designing an information leaflet to meet the specific needs of the target population.

Authors:  M E Mennie; W A Liston; D J Brock
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: implications for obstetric and gynecologic practice.

Authors:  S Elias; G J Annas; J L Simpson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  M E Mennie; A Gilfillan; M Compton; L Curtis; W A Liston; I Pullen; D A Whyte; D J Brock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-25       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Efficacy of statewide neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis by assay of trypsinogen concentrations.

Authors:  K B Hammond; S H Abman; R J Sokol; F J Accurso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  17 in total

1.  Attitudes toward cystic fibrosis carrier and prenatal testing and utilization of carrier testing among relatives of individuals with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  DeeDee Lafayette; Dianne Abuelo; Mary Ann Passero; Umadevi Tantravahi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Carrier screening in preconception consultation in primary care.

Authors:  Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-20

Review 3.  A review of consanguinity in Ireland--estimation of frequency and approaches to mitigate risks.

Authors:  P Barrett
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Parents' perceptions of functioning in families having a child with a genetic condition.

Authors:  Kathleen A Knafl; George J Knafl; Agatha M Gallo; Denise Angst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A targeted population carrier screening program for severe and frequent genetic diseases in Israel.

Authors:  Joël Zlotogora; Rivka Carmi; Boaz Lev; Stavit A Shalev
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  The new genetics. Implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; J Reinhard; M Bobrow; S Pauker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-07

7.  "Suddenly Having two Positive People who are Carriers is a Whole New Thing" - Experiences of Couples Both Identified as Carriers of Cystic Fibrosis Through a Population-Based Carrier Screening Program in Australia.

Authors:  Liane Ioannou; Martin B Delatycki; John Massie; Jan Hodgson; Sharon Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S Janssens; A De Paepe; P Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-12-29

9.  The changing landscape of carrier screening: expanding technology and options?.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Deborah Cho; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  2013

10.  'No thanks'-reasons why pregnant women declined an offer of cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  L Ioannou; J Massie; S Lewis; B McClaren; V Collins; M B Delatycki
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.