Literature DB >> 17273956

Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.

Anthony J Viera1, Shrikant I Bangdiwala.   

Abstract

Randomization in randomized controlled trials involves more than generation of a random sequence by which to assign subjects. For randomization to be successfully implemented, the randomization sequence must be adequately protected (concealed) so that investigators, involved health care providers, and subjects are not aware of the upcoming assignment. The absence of adequate allocation concealment can lead to selection bias, one of the very problems that randomization was supposed to eliminate. Authors of reports of randomized trials should provide enough details on how allocation concealment was achieved so the reader can determine the likelihood of success. Fortunately, a plan of allocation concealment can always be incorporated into the design of a randomized trial. Certain methods minimize the risk of concealment failing more than others. Keeping knowledge of subjects' assignment after allocation from subjects, investigators/health care providers, or those assessing outcomes is referred to as masking (also known as blinding). The goal of masking is to prevent ascertainment bias. In contrast to allocation concealment, masking cannot always be incorporated into a randomized controlled trial. Both allocation concealment and masking add to the elimination of bias in randomized controlled trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17273956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  42 in total

1.  Using Evidence to Recommend Interventions for Long-term Weight Control in Overweight Children.

Authors:  Nuananong Seal; Marion Broome
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 0.767

2.  Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part III. Overcoming operational challenges in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Elena Losina; James Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  On Framing the Research Question and Choosing the Appropriate Research Design.

Authors:  Patrick S Parfrey; Pietro Ravani
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 4.  Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for psychological distress in patients with physical illnesses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew McCombie; Richard Gearry; Jane Andrews; Antonina Mikocka-Walus; Roger Mulder
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  The potential benefits and harms of early feeding post-surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Genevieve Abela
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  A mapping review of randomized controlled trials in the spinal cord injury research literature.

Authors:  Amanda McIntyre; Brooke Benton; Shannon Janzen; Jerome Iruthayarajah; Joshua Wiener; Janice J Eng; Robert Teasell
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Genetic testing likelihood: the impact of abortion views and quality of life information on women's decisions.

Authors:  Jessica L Wilson; Gail M Ferguson; Judith M Thorn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Architecture design of a generic centralized adjudication module integrated in a web-based clinical trial management system.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Keith Pauls
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Pharmaceutical care of adolescents with diabetes mellitus type 1: the DIADEMA study, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emina Obarcanin; Manfred Krüger; Petra Müller; Verena Nemitz; Holger Schwender; Snijezana Hasanbegovic; Sena Kalajdzisalihovic; Stephanie Läer
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-04-28

Review 10.  Guidelines for the Reporting of Treatment Trials for Alcohol Use Disorders.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; John W Finney; Alex H S Harris; Daniel R Kivlahan; Henry R Kranzler
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.