Literature DB >> 20151773

System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Guido Freckmann1, Annette Baumstark, Nina Jendrike, Eva Zschornack, Serge Kocher, Jacques Tshiananga, Frank Heister, Cornelia Haug.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood glucose (BG) monitoring systems enable diabetes patients to effectively control and adjust their therapy. BG monitoring systems with a Conformité Européenne (CE) label should meet the standard DIN EN ISO 15197:2003: > or =95% of the BG results shall fall within +/-15 mg/dL of the reference method at BG concentrations <75 mg/dL and within +/-20% at BG concentrations > or =75 mg/dL. We intended to verify if BG monitoring systems with a CE label fulfill these minimum accuracy requirements.
METHODS: We evaluated 27 BG monitoring systems from 18 manufacturers for system accuracy according to DIN EN ISO 15197:2003. Twenty-four systems were compared with the glucose oxidase reaction (YSI 2300 glucose analyzer [YSI Life Sciences, Yellow Springs, OH]) and three systems with the hexokinase reaction (Hitachi 917 [Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany]). Duplicate measurements of 100 blood samples with a defined distribution of BG concentrations from 20 mg/dL to 600 mg/dL from > or =100 subjects were included in the evaluation.
RESULTS: Sixteen of the 27 BG monitoring systems fulfilled the minimum accuracy requirements of the standard, i.e., > or =95% of their results showed the minimum acceptable accuracy. Overall, the mean percentage of results showing the minimum acceptable accuracy was 95.2 +/- 5.2%, ranging from 80.0% to 100.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: More than 40% of the evaluated BG monitoring systems did not fulfill the minimum accuracy requirements of DIN EN ISO 15197:2003. As inaccurate BG monitoring systems bear the risk of false treatment decisions by the diabetes patient and subsequent possible severe health injury, manufacturers should regularly and effectively check the quality of BG meters and BG test strips.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20151773     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2009.0128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  61 in total

1.  Glucose information for tight glycemic control: different methods with different challenges.

Authors:  Christian Weber; Kurt Neeser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  We need tighter regulatory standards for blood glucose monitoring, but they should be for accuracy disclosure.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

3.  Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Volker Lodwig; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors meeting, October 28, 2011.

Authors:  John Walsh; Ruth Roberts; Robert A Vigersky; Frank Schwartz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 5.  Assessing the analytical performance of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose: concepts of performance evaluation and definition of metrological key terms.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Rolf Hinzmann; Bernd Kulzer; Guido Freckmann; Michael Erbach; Volker Lodwig; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

6.  Analysis of "Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial".

Authors:  Paul A Fournier
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.

Authors:  Solveig Halldorsdottir; Mary Ellen Warchal-Windham; Jane F Wallace; Scott Pardo; Joan Lee Parkes; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

8.  Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.

Authors:  Ronald L Brazg; Leslie J Klaff; Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 9.  Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Malte Rutschmann; Cornelia Haug; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-14

10.  Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Debbie Mondesir; Norman Lautsch; Courtney Balliro; Mallory Hillard; Kendra Magyar; Laura Goergen Radocchia; Aryan Esmaeili; Manasi Sinha; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.