Kevin T Chen1,2, David Izquierdo-Garcia1, Clare B Poynton1,3,4, Daniel B Chonde1,5, Ciprian Catana6. 1. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. 2. Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 6. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. ccatana@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To propose an MR-based method for generating continuous-valued head attenuation maps and to assess its accuracy and reproducibility. Demonstrating that novel MR-based photon attenuation correction methods are both accurate and reproducible is essential prior to using them routinely in research and clinical studies on integrated PET/MR scanners. METHODS: Continuous-valued linear attenuation coefficient maps ("μ-maps") were generated by combining atlases that provided the prior probability of voxel positions belonging to a certain tissue class (air, soft tissue, or bone) and an MR intensity-based likelihood classifier to produce posterior probability maps of tissue classes. These probabilities were used as weights to generate the μ-maps. The accuracy of this probabilistic atlas-based continuous-valued μ-map ("PAC-map") generation method was assessed by calculating the voxel-wise absolute relative change (RC) between the MR-based and scaled CT-based attenuation-corrected PET images. To assess reproducibility, we performed pair-wise comparisons of the RC values obtained from the PET images reconstructed using the μ-maps generated from the data acquired at three time points. RESULTS: The proposed method produced continuous-valued μ-maps that qualitatively reflected the variable anatomy in patients with brain tumor and agreed well with the scaled CT-based μ-maps. The absolute RC comparing the resulting PET volumes was 1.76 ± 2.33 %, quantitatively demonstrating that the method is accurate. Additionally, we also showed that the method is highly reproducible, the mean RC value for the PET images reconstructed using the μ-maps obtained at the three visits being 0.65 ± 0.95 %. CONCLUSION: Accurate and highly reproducible continuous-valued head μ-maps can be generated from MR data using a probabilistic atlas-based approach.
PURPOSE: To propose an MR-based method for generating continuous-valued head attenuation maps and to assess its accuracy and reproducibility. Demonstrating that novel MR-based photon attenuation correction methods are both accurate and reproducible is essential prior to using them routinely in research and clinical studies on integrated PET/MR scanners. METHODS: Continuous-valued linear attenuation coefficient maps ("μ-maps") were generated by combining atlases that provided the prior probability of voxel positions belonging to a certain tissue class (air, soft tissue, or bone) and an MR intensity-based likelihood classifier to produce posterior probability maps of tissue classes. These probabilities were used as weights to generate the μ-maps. The accuracy of this probabilistic atlas-based continuous-valued μ-map ("PAC-map") generation method was assessed by calculating the voxel-wise absolute relative change (RC) between the MR-based and scaled CT-based attenuation-corrected PET images. To assess reproducibility, we performed pair-wise comparisons of the RC values obtained from the PET images reconstructed using the μ-maps generated from the data acquired at three time points. RESULTS: The proposed method produced continuous-valued μ-maps that qualitatively reflected the variable anatomy in patients with brain tumor and agreed well with the scaled CT-based μ-maps. The absolute RC comparing the resulting PET volumes was 1.76 ± 2.33 %, quantitatively demonstrating that the method is accurate. Additionally, we also showed that the method is highly reproducible, the mean RC value for the PET images reconstructed using the μ-maps obtained at the three visits being 0.65 ± 0.95 %. CONCLUSION: Accurate and highly reproducible continuous-valued head μ-maps can be generated from MR data using a probabilistic atlas-based approach.
Authors: Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Joaquin L Herraiz; Eduardo Alcain; Antonio S Montemayor; Lina Garcia-Cañamaque; Juan A Hernandez-Tamames; Yves Rozenholc; Norberto Malpica Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ciprian Catana; Andre van der Kouwe; Thomas Benner; Christian J Michel; Michael Hamm; Matthias Fenchel; Bruce Fischl; Bruce Rosen; Matthias Schmand; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ian B Malone; Richard E Ansorge; Guy B Williams; Peter J Nestor; T Adrian Carpenter; Tim D Fryer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-04-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Silvia Morbelli; Javier Arbizu; Jan Booij; Ming-Kai Chen; Gael Chetelat; Donna J Cross; Mehdi Djekidel; Alexander Drzezga; Ozgul Ekmekcioglu; Valentina Garibotto; Swen Hesse; Kazunari Ishii; Lida Jafari; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ian Law; Dana Mathews; Satoshi Minoshima; Karina Mosci; Marco Pagani; Sabina Pappata; Daniel Hillel Silverman; Alberto Signore; Elsmarieke Van De Giessen; Victor Villemagne; Henryk Barthel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Kevin T Chen; Stephanie Salcedo; Daniel B Chonde; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Michael A Levine; Julie C Price; Bradford C Dickerson; Ciprian Catana Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Ronan Abgral; Maria Giovanna Trivieri; Marc R Dweck; Philip M Robson; Claudia Calcagno; Gilles Boeykens; Max L Senders; Willem J M Mulder; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Kevin T Chen; Stephanie Salcedo; Kuang Gong; Daniel B Chonde; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Alexander E Drzezga; Bruce Rosen; Jinyi Qi; Bradford C Dickerson; Ciprian Catana Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yasheng Chen; Chunwei Ying; Michael M Binkley; Meher R Juttukonda; Shaney Flores; Richard Laforest; Tammie L S Benzinger; Hongyu An Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Eric Einspänner; Thies H Jochimsen; Osama Sabri; Bernhard Sattler; Johanna Harries; Andreas Melzer; Michael Unger; Richard Brown; Kris Thielemans Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Ana M Franceschi; Valentino Abballe; Roy A Raad; Aaron Nelson; Kimberly Jackson; James Babb; Thomas Vahle; Matthias Fenchel; Yiqiang Zhan; Gerardo Hermosillo Valadez; Timothy M Shepherd; Kent P Friedman Journal: World J Nucl Med Date: 2018 Jul-Sep