Literature DB >> 12931319

X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Paul E Kinahan1, Bruce H Hasegawa, Thomas Beyer.   

Abstract

A synergy of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanners is the use of the CT data for x-ray-based attenuation correction of the PET emission data. Current methods of measuring transmission use positron sources, gamma-ray sources, or x-ray sources. Each of the types of transmission scans involves different trade-offs of noise versus bias, with positron transmission scans having the highest noise but lowest bias, whereas x-ray scans have negligible noise but the potential for increased quantitative errors. The use of x-ray-based attenuation correction, however, has other advantages, including a lack of bias introduced from post-injection transmission scanning, which is an important practical consideration for clinical scanners, as well as reduced scan times. The sensitivity of x-ray-based attenuation correction to artifacts and quantitative errors depends on the method of translating the CT image from the effective x-ray energy of approximately 70 keV to attenuation coefficients at the PET energy of 511 keV. These translation methods are usually based on segmentation and/or scaling techniques. Errors in the PET emission image arise from positional mismatches caused by patient motion or respiration differences between the PET and CT scans; incorrect calculation of attenuation coefficients for CT contrast agents or metallic implants; or keeping the patient's arms in the field of view, which leads to truncation and/or beam-hardening (or x-ray scatter) artifacts. Proper interpretation of PET emission images corrected for attenuation by using the CT image relies on an understanding of the potential artifacts. In cases where an artifact or bias is suspected, careful inspection of all three available images (CT and PET emission with and without attenuation correction) is recommended. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12931319     DOI: 10.1053/snuc.2003.127307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  125 in total

1.  The new-generation positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners: implications for cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Stephen L Bacharach
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT with highly concentrated contrast agent can be used for PET attenuation correction in integrated PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Philip Aschoff; Christian Plathow; Thomas Beyer; Matthias P Lichy; Gunter Erb; Mehmet Ö Öksüz; Claus D Claussen; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparative assessment of energy-mapping approaches in CT-based attenuation correction for PET.

Authors:  Mohammad R Ay; Maryam Shirmohammad; Saeed Sarkar; Arman Rahmim; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Attenuation-emission alignment in cardiac PET/CT based on consistency conditions.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle M Champley; James H Caldwell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Noise and Bias Properties of Monoenergetic Images from DECT used for Attenuation Correction with PET/CT and SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Ting Xia; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-05-22

6.  Improvements in PET Image Quality in Time of Flight (TOF) Simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Craig Levin; Mehran Jamali; Dawn Holley; Amir Barkhodari; Greg Zaharchuk; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review.

Authors:  Yannick Berker; Yusheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Fast analytical approach of application specific dose efficient spectrum selection for diagnostic CT imaging and PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Xue Rui; Yannan Jin; Paul F FitzGerald; Mingye Wu; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Bruno De Man
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Cine CT for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Steve Kohlmyer; Kelley Branch; Grace Chen; James Caldwell; Paul Kinahan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.