Literature DB >> 21136278

Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards.

Christopher Bergevin1.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are sounds emitted by the ear and provide a non-invasive probe into mechanisms underlying peripheral auditory transduction. This study focuses upon a comparison of emission properties in two phylogenetically similar pairs of gecko: Gekko gecko and Hemidactylus turcicus and Eublepharis macularius and Coleonyx variegatus. Each pair consists of two closely related species within the same subfamily, with quantitatively known morphological properties at the level of the auditory sensory organ (basilar papilla) in the inner ear. Essentially, the comparison boils down to an issue of size: how does overall body size, as well as the inner-ear dimensions (e.g., papilla length and number of hair cells), affect peripheral auditory function as inferred from OAEs? Estimates of frequency selectivity derived from stimulus-frequency emissions (emissions evoked by a single low-level tone) indicate that tuning is broader in the species with fewer hair cells/shorter papilla. Furthermore, emissions extend outwards to higher frequencies (for similar body temperatures) in the species with the smaller body size/narrower interaural spacing. This observation suggests the smaller species have relatively improved high-frequency sensitivity, possibly related to vocalizations and/or aiding azimuthal sound localization. For one species (Eublepharis), emissions were also examined in both juveniles and adults. Qualitatively similar emission properties in both suggests that inner-ear function is adult like soon after hatching and that external body size (e.g., middle-ear dimensions and interaural spacing) has a relatively small impact upon emission properties within a species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136278      PMCID: PMC3046335          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0253-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  65 in total

Review 1.  A review of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R Probst; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Laser-feedback measurements of turtle basilar membrane motion using direct reflection.

Authors:  M P O'Neill; A Bearden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in two gecko species, Gekko gecko and Eublepharis macularius.

Authors:  G A Manley; L Gallo; C Koppl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic distortion products from the cochlea of the blind African mole rat, Cryptomys spec.

Authors:  M Kössl; G Frank; H Burda; M Müller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I: General characteristics.

Authors:  C Köppl; G A Manley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. II: Interactions with external tones.

Authors:  C Köppl; G A Manley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Otoacoustic emissions, hair cells, and myosin motors.

Authors:  G A Manley; L Gallo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  How body size affects middle-ear structure and function and auditory sensitivity in gekkonoid lizards.

Authors:  Y L Werner; L G Montgomery; S D Safford; P G Igic; J C Saunders
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Representation of acoustic signals in the eighth nerve of the Tokay gecko: I. Pure tones.

Authors:  F Sams-Dodd; R R Capranica
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Quantitative anatomical basis for a model of micromechanical frequency tuning in the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko.

Authors:  C Köppl; S Authier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  4 in total

1.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  A resonance approach to cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Andrew Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Gekko japonicus genome reveals evolution of adhesive toe pads and tail regeneration.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Qian Zhou; Yongjun Wang; Longhai Luo; Jian Yang; Linfeng Yang; Mei Liu; Yingrui Li; Tianmei Qian; Yuan Zheng; Meiyuan Li; Jiang Li; Yun Gu; Zujing Han; Man Xu; Yingjie Wang; Changlai Zhu; Bin Yu; Yumin Yang; Fei Ding; Jianping Jiang; Huanming Yang; Xiaosong Gu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.