Literature DB >> 10618439

Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko.

C E Stewart1, A J Hudspeth.   

Abstract

The high sensitivity and sharp frequency discrimination of hearing depend on mechanical amplification in the cochlea. To explore the basis of this active process, we examined the pharmacological sensitivity of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) in a lizard, the Tokay gecko. In a quiet environment, each ear produced a complex but stable pattern of emissions. These SOAEs were reversibly modulated by drugs that affect mammalian otoacoustic emissions, the salicylates and the aminoglycoside antibiotics. The effect of a single i.p. injection of sodium salicylate depended on the initial power of the emissions: ears with strong control SOAEs displayed suppression at all frequencies, whereas those with weak control emissions showed enhancement. Repeated oral administration of acetylsalicylic acid reduced all emissions. Single i.p. doses of gentamicin or kanamycin suppressed SOAEs below 2.6 kHz, while modulating those above 2.6 kHz in either of two ways. For ears whose emission power at 2.6-5.2 kHz encompassed more than half of the total, individual emissions displayed facilitation as great as 35-fold. For the remaining ears, emissions dropped to as little as one-sixth of their initial values. The similarity of the responses of reptilian and mammalian cochleas to pharmacological intervention provides further evidence for a common mechanism of cochlear amplification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10618439      PMCID: PMC26684          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.1.454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig.

Authors:  K Ohyama; H Wada; T Kobayashi; T Takasaka
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Concomitant salicylate-induced alterations of outer hair cell subsurface cisternae and electromotility.

Authors:  R Dieler; W E Shehata-Dieler; W E Brownell
Journal:  J Neurocytol       Date:  1991-08

Review 3.  Otoacoustic emissions: an overview.

Authors:  R Probst
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1990

4.  Effects of salicylate on shape, electromotility and membrane characteristics of isolated outer hair cells from guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  W E Shehata; W E Brownell; R Dieler
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment.

Authors:  A M Brown; B McDowell; A Forge
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cell.

Authors:  J Howard; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Blockage of the transduction channels of hair cells in the bullfrog's sacculus by aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Authors:  A B Kroese; A Das; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. III: Temperature effects.

Authors:  G A Manley; C Köppl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Mechanisms of salicylate ototoxicity.

Authors:  P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.

Authors:  W W Clark; D O Kim; P M Zurek; B A Bohne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  20 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Depolarization of cochlear outer hair cells evokes active hair bundle motion by two mechanisms.

Authors:  Helen J Kennedy; Michael G Evans; Andrew C Crawford; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency clustering in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from a lizard's ear.

Authors:  Andrej Vilfan; Thomas Duke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-09

7.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Molecular dynamics simulations of salicylate effects on the micro- and mesoscopic properties of a dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer.

Authors:  Yuhua Song; Victor Guallar; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interactions between hair cells shape spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a model of the tokay gecko's cochlea.

Authors:  Michael Gelfand; Oreste Piro; Marcelo O Magnasco; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.