Literature DB >> 19673837

Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing.

Nina Kraus1, Erika Skoe, Alexandra Parbery-Clark, Richard Ashley.   

Abstract

Speech and music are highly complex signals that have many shared acoustic features. Pitch, Timbre, and Timing can be used as overarching perceptual categories for describing these shared properties. The acoustic cues contributing to these percepts also have distinct subcortical representations which can be selectively enhanced or degraded in different populations. Musically trained subjects are found to have enhanced subcortical representations of pitch, timbre, and timing. The effects of musical experience on subcortical auditory processing are pervasive and extend beyond music to the domains of language and emotion. The sensory malleability of the neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing can be affected by lifelong experience and short-term training. This conceptual framework and supporting data can be applied to consider sensory learning of speech and music through a hearing aid or cochlear implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673837      PMCID: PMC2810198          DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04549.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  76 in total

1.  Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers.

Authors:  S Nagarajan; H Mahncke; T Salz; P Tallal; T Roberts; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Mariana C Leal; Young Je Shin; Marie-Laurence Laborde; Marie-Noëlle Calmels; Sebastien Verges; Stéphanie Lugardon; Sandrine Andrieu; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 3.  Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system.

Authors:  Nobuo Suga; Xiaofeng Ma
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  The statistical structure of human speech sounds predicts musical universals.

Authors:  David A Schwartz; Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Christian Gaser; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Stefan Koelsch; Matthias Wittfoth; Angelika Wolf; Joachim Müller; Anja Hahne
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Correlation between brainstem and cortical auditory processes in normal and language-impaired children.

Authors:  Brad Wible; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Brain organization for music processing.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Yisheng Xu; Jackson Gandour; Peter Cariani
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

10.  Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  51 in total

1.  Melodic contour identification and sentence recognition using sung speech.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vindicating virtue: a critical analysis of the situationist challenge against Aristotelian moral psychology.

Authors:  Adam M Croom
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2014-03

3.  Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Aesthetic concepts, perceptual learning, and linguistic enculturation: considerations from Wittgenstein, language, and music.

Authors:  Adam M Croom
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2012-03

6.  Beyond Technology: The Interaction of Perceptual Accuracy and Experiential Factors in Pediatric Music Engagement.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Adam Schwalje
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Kelsey Mankel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Hearing it again and again: on-line subcortical plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.