Literature DB >> 23862815

A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Li Zhu1, Hari Bharadwaj, Jing Xia, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

Two experiments, both presenting diotic, harmonic tone complexes (100 Hz fundamental), were conducted to explore the envelope-related component of the frequency-following response (FFRENV), a measure of synchronous, subcortical neural activity evoked by a periodic acoustic input. Experiment 1 directly compared two common analysis methods, computing the magnitude spectrum and the phase-locking value (PLV). Bootstrapping identified which FFRENV frequency components were statistically above the noise floor for each metric and quantified the statistical power of the approaches. Across listeners and conditions, the two methods produced highly correlated results. However, PLV analysis required fewer processing stages to produce readily interpretable results. Moreover, at the fundamental frequency of the input, PLVs were farther above the metric's noise floor than spectral magnitudes. Having established the advantages of PLV analysis, the efficacy of the approach was further demonstrated by investigating how different acoustic frequencies contribute to FFRENV, analyzing responses to complex tones composed of different acoustic harmonics of 100 Hz (Experiment 2). Results show that the FFRENV response is dominated by peripheral auditory channels responding to unresolved harmonics, although low-frequency channels driven by resolved harmonics also contribute. These results demonstrate the utility of the PLV for quantifying the strength of FFRENV across conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862815      PMCID: PMC3724813          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

Review 3.  Auditory frequency-following response: a neurophysiological measure for studying the "cocktail-party problem".

Authors:  Yi Du; Lingzhi Kong; Qian Wang; Xihong Wu; Liang Li
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The temporal relationship between speech auditory brainstem responses and the acoustic pattern of the phoneme /ba/ in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  I Akhoun; S Gallégo; A Moulin; M Ménard; E Veuillet; C Berger-Vachon; L Collet; H Thai-Van
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The frequency following response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Anahita Mehta; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09

10.  An auditory neural correlate suggests a mechanism underlying holistic pitch perception.

Authors:  Daryl Wile; Evan Balaban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  34 in total

1.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing: unique contributions of neural dyssynchrony and slowed neuronal processing.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 6.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Mutual information analysis of neural representations of speech in noise in the aging midbrain.

Authors:  Peng Zan; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Michelle D Valero; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.