Literature DB >> 18370594

Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstem following short-term linguistic training.

Judy H Song1, Erika Skoe, Patrick C M Wong, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Peripheral and central structures along the auditory pathway contribute to speech processing and learning. However, because speech requires the use of functionally and acoustically complex sounds which necessitates high sensory and cognitive demands, long-term exposure and experience using these sounds is often attributed to the neocortex with little emphasis placed on subcortical structures. The present study examines changes in the auditory brainstem, specifically the frequency following response (FFR), as native English-speaking adults learn to incorporate foreign speech sounds (lexical pitch patterns) in word identification. The FFR presumably originates from the auditory midbrain and can be elicited preattentively. We measured FFRs to the trained pitch patterns before and after training. Measures of pitch tracking were then derived from the FFR signals. We found increased accuracy in pitch tracking after training, including a decrease in the number of pitch-tracking errors and a refinement in the energy devoted to encoding pitch. Most interestingly, this change in pitch-tracking accuracy only occurred in the most acoustically complex pitch contour (dipping contour), which is also the least familiar to our English-speaking subjects. These results not only demonstrate the contribution of the brainstem in language learning and its plasticity in adulthood but also demonstrate the specificity of this contribution (i.e., changes in encoding only occur in specific, least familiar stimuli, not all stimuli). Our findings complement existing data showing cortical changes after second-language learning, and are consistent with models suggesting that brainstem changes resulting from perceptual learning are most apparent when acuity in encoding is most needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18370594      PMCID: PMC2829864          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  41 in total

1.  Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training.

Authors:  K Tremblay; N Kraus; T McGee; C Ponton; B Otis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Perceptual learning without perception.

Authors:  T Watanabe; J E Náñez; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive?

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Tyler K Perrachione; Todd B Parrish
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children.

Authors:  Takako Fujioka; Bernhard Ross; Ryusuke Kakigi; Christo Pantev; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Neural processing and representation of periodicity pitch.

Authors:  G Langner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1997

9.  The perception of fundamental frequency declination.

Authors:  J Pierrehumbert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  123 in total

1.  Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Speech evoked auditory brainstem responses: a new tool to study brainstem encoding of speech sounds.

Authors:  Sujeet Kumar Sinha; Vijayalakshmi Basavaraj
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-11

3.  Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Viorica Marian; Anthony Shook; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Decoding temporal structure in music and speech relies on shared brain resources but elicits different fine-scale spatial patterns.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Anjali Bhatara; Srikanth Ryali; Evan Balaban; Daniel J Levitin; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

Review 7.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

8.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Emotion and the auditory brainstem response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Q Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.