Literature DB >> 18658069

Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise.

Patrick C M Wong1, Ajith K Uppunda, Todd B Parrish, Sumitrajit Dhar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study examines the brain basis of listening to spoken words in noise, which is a ubiquitous characteristic of communication, with the focus on the dorsal auditory pathway.
METHOD: English-speaking young adults identified single words in 3 listening conditions while their hemodynamic response was measured using fMRI: speech in quiet, speech in moderately loud noise (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] 20 dB), and in loud noise (SNR -5 dB).
RESULTS: Behaviorally, participants' performance (both accuracy and reaction time) did not differ between the quiet and SNR 20 dB condition, whereas they were less accurate and responded slower in the SNR -5 dB condition compared with the other 2 conditions. In the superior temporal gyrus (STG), both left and right auditory cortex showed increased activation in the noise conditions relative to quiet, including the middle portion of STG (mSTG). Although the right posterior STG (pSTG) showed similar activation for the 2 noise conditions, the left pSTG showed increased activation in the SNR -5 dB condition relative to the SNR 20 dB condition.
CONCLUSION: We found cortical task-independent and noise-dependent effects concerning speech perception in noise involving bilateral mSTG and left pSTG. These results likely reflect demands in acoustic analysis, auditory-motor integration, and phonological memory, as well as auditory attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18658069     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/075)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  50 in total

1.  Brain Activation during Addition and Subtraction Tasks In-Noise and In-Quiet.

Authors:  Aini Ismafairus Abd Hamid; Ahmad Nazlim Yusoff; Siti Zamratol-Mai Sarah Mukari; Mazlyfarina Mohamad
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2011-04

2.  The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Stephanie L Cute; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Rapid tuning of auditory "what" and "where" pathways by training.

Authors:  Yi Du; Yu He; Stephen R Arnott; Bernhard Ross; Xihong Wu; Liang Li; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Cooing- and babbling-related gamma-oscillations during infancy: intracranial recording.

Authors:  Yoshimi Cho-Hisamoto; Katsuaki Kojima; Erik C Brown; Naoyuki Matsuzaki; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.937

6.  A modular high-density μECoG system on macaque vlPFC for auditory cognitive decoding.

Authors:  Chia-Han Chiang; Jaejin Lee; Charles Wang; Ashley J Williams; Timothy H Lucas; Yale E Cohen; Jonathan Viventi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Skill dependent audiovisual integration in the fusiform induces repetition suppression.

Authors:  Chris McNorgan; James R Booth
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Contribution of spiking activity in the primary auditory cortex to detection in noise.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Sharath Bennur; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The role of the arcuate and middle longitudinal fasciculi in speech perception in noise in adulthood.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Maxime Perron; Isabelle Deschamps; Dan Kennedy-Higgins; Jean-Christophe Houde; Anthony Steven Dick; Maxime Descoteaux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.