Literature DB >> 20680462

Low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective ECG-triggering compared to invasive coronary angiography.

Yoo Jin Hong1, Sang Jin Kim, Sang Min Lee, Phil Ki Min, Young Won Yoon, Byung Kwon Lee, Tae Hoon Kim.   

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of prospective ECG-triggering 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Forty-two patients (31 males, 11 females, mean age 64 years) underwent cardiac CT and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Patients with a heart rate of <65 beats/min with stable heart rhythm were included in the study sample. We used a prospective ECG-triggering protocol. Luminal narrowing over 50% was considered to be significant according to a modified 17-segment AHA model, using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the standard of reference. The mean radiation dose was 3.5 mSv ± 0.3 (range, 3.3-4.2 mSv), and 542 of 549 segments (98.7%) in the 42 patients were diagnostic. In contrast, 119 of 542 segments (22%) were diagnosed as significant by ICA. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were 95.0, 96.2, 96, 85.8 and 98.8%, respectively. False positive results were affected by densely calcified plaques, whereas false negatives were caused by motion artifact with poor vessel attenuation at the distal segments or near the bifurcation area of the coronary arteries. Prospective ECG-triggering MDCT is a useful method for evaluating CAD in patients with a lower heart rate with low radiation dose. © Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20680462     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9674-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

1.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  L J M Kroft; A de Roos; J Geleijns
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Tobias Krauss; Lotus Desbiolles; André Plass; Michele Genoni; Thomas G Flohr; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Giuseppe Runza; Eugène P McFadden; Timo Baks; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Francesca Pugliese; Nico R A Mollet; Giuseppe Runza; Carlos van Mieghem; Willem B Meijboom; Patrizia Malagutti; Timo Baks; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J deFeyter; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography.

Authors:  Duncan R Coles; Mary A Smail; Ian S Negus; Peter Wilde; Martin Oberhoff; Karl R Karsch; Andreas Baumbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephanie Busch; Alexander W Leber; Alexander Becker; Bernd J Wintersperger; Carsten Rist; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Ulrike Ropers; Dieter Ropers; Tobias Pflederer; Katharina Anders; Axel Kuettner; Nikolaos I Stilianakis; Sei Komatsu; Willi Kalender; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  The feasibility of sub-millisievert coronary CT angiography with low tube voltage, prospective ECG gating, and a knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Chul Hwan Park; Joohee Lee; Chisuk Oh; Kyung Hwa Han; Tae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Effectiveness of Using Dual-source CT and the Upshot it creates on Both Heart Rate and Image Quality.

Authors:  Tuba Selçuk; Hafize Otçu; Zeyneb Yüceler; Çiğdem Bilgili; Mesut Bulakçı; Yıldıray Savaş; Ömer Çelik
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 4.  Coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

Review 5.  Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Evaluation of a chest circumference-adapted protocol for low-dose 128-slice coronary CT angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering.

Authors:  Chenying Lu; Zufei Wang; Jiansong Ji; Hailin Wang; Xianghua Hu; Chunmiao Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Computed Tomography Angiography with a 192-slice Dual-source Computed Tomography System: Improvements in Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

Authors:  Philip V M Linsen; Adriaan Coenen; Marisa M Lubbers; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Mohamed Ouhlous; Koen Nieman
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2016-10-21

8.  Non-inferior low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography image quality with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction for overweight patients.

Authors:  In Kyung Park; Jeffrey Park; Tae Hoon Kim; Joohee Lee; Kyunghwa Han; Chisuk Oh; Chul Hwan Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of low-radiation coronary computed tomography angiography with low tube voltage and knowledge-based model reconstruction.

Authors:  Joohee Lee; Tae Hoon Kim; Byoung Kwon Lee; Young Won Yoon; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Bum Kee Hong; Pil-Ki Min; Eui-Young Choi; Chi Suk Oh; Chul Hwan Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.