Literature DB >> 16203914

High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography.

Nico R Mollet1, Filippo Cademartiri, Carlos A G van Mieghem, Giuseppe Runza, Eugène P McFadden, Timo Baks, Patrick W Serruys, Gabriel P Krestin, Pim J de Feyter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic performance of the latest 64-slice CT scanner, with increased temporal (165 ms) and spatial (0.4 mm3) resolution, to detect significant stenoses in the clinically relevant coronary tree is unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 52 patients (34 men; mean age, 59.6+/-12.1 years) with atypical chest pain, stable or unstable angina pectoris, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. All patients had stable sinus rhythm. Patients with initial heart rates > or =70 bpm received beta-blockers. Mean scan time was 13.3+/-0.9 seconds. The CT scans were analyzed by 2 observers unaware of the results of invasive coronary angiography, which was used as the standard of reference. All available coronary segments, regardless of size, were included in the evaluation. Lesions with > or =50 luminal narrowing were considered significant stenoses. Invasive coronary angiography demonstrated the absence of significant disease in 25% (13 of 52), single-vessel disease in 31% (16 of 52), and multivessel disease in 45% (23 of 52) of patients. One unsuccessful CT scan was classified as inconclusive. Ninety-four significant stenoses were present in the remaining 51 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CT for detecting significant stenoses on a segment-by-segment analysis were 99% (93 of 94; 95% CI, 94 to 99), 95% (601 of 631; 95% CI, 93 to 96), 76% (93 of 123; 95% CI, 67 to 89), and 99% (601 of 602; 95% CI, 99 to 100), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography accurately detects coronary stenoses in patients in sinus rhythm and presenting with atypical chest pain, stable or unstable angina, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16203914     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  252 in total

1.  A pilot study on diagnosis of coronary artery disease using computed tomography first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at rest.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Jing Qin; Lu-yue Gai; Yun-dai Chen; Wei Dong; Zhi-wei Guan; Zhi-guo Wang; Zhi-jun Sun; Jia-he Tian
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Wm Guy Weigold; Gaby Weissman; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Anomalous origination of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus.

Authors:  Joanna C E Lim; Andy Beale; Steve Ramcharitar
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the aortic valve-aortic root complex without ECG-synchronization.

Authors:  Christoph Karlo; Sebastian Leschka; Robert Paul Goetti; Gudrun Feuchtner; Lotus Desbiolles; Paul Stolzmann; Andre Plass; Volkmar Falk; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Stephan Baumüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Low dose dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Cormac Farrelly; Amir Davarpanah; Aoife N Keeling; John Sheehan; Ann Ragin; Vahid Yaghmai; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography - what has been achieved and what needs to be done.

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Relationship between beat to beat coronary artery motion and image quality in prospectively ECG-gated two heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Nobuo Tomizawa; Shuhei Komatsu; Masaaki Akahane; Rumiko Torigoe; Shigeru Kiryu; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Dose and image quality comparison between prospectively gated axial and retrospectively gated helical coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  C Hlaihel; L Boussel; H Cochet; J A Roch; P Coulon; M J Walker; P C Douek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Evaluation of the appropriateness criteria for coronary computed tomography angiography in an academic medical center in a developing country: comparison of the 2006 and 2010 criteria.

Authors:  Katia El Sibai; Salam Itani; Ali Rabah; Mukbil Hourani; Habib A Dakik
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Coronary artery bypass grafts and MDCT imaging: what to know and what to look for.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Carlo Liguori; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Maria Luigia Storto; Marco Angelo Politi; Giancarlo Savino; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.