Literature DB >> 22212661

Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhonghua Sun1, Kwan-Hoong Ng.   

Abstract

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of prospective ECG-gating coronary CT angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A search of biomedical databases for English literature was performed to identify studies investigating the diagnostic value of 64- or more slice CT angiography with use of prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value estimates pooled across studies were tested using a fixed effects model. Fourteen studies met selection criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence interval (CI) of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of prospective ECG-gating coronary CT angiography for diagnosis of significant coronary stenosis were 99% (95% CI: 98, 100%), 91% (95% CI: 88, 94%), 94% (95% CI: 91, 96%) and 99% (95% CI: 97, 100%), according to the patient-based assessment. The mean values of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of prospective ECG-gating coronary CT angiography were 95% (95% CI: 93, 96%), 95% (95% CI: 93, 95%), 88% (95% CI: 86, 90%), and 98% (95% CI: 97, 98%), according to vessel-based assessment; 92% (95% CI: 90, 93%), 97% (95% CI: 97, 98%), 84% (95% CI: 82, 86%), 99% (95% CI: 99, 99%), according to segment-based assessment, respectively. The mean effective dose was 3.3 mSv (95% CI: 2.3, 4.1 mSv) for the prospective ECG-gating coronary CT angiography. This analysis shows that for a predominantly male population with a high disease prevalence the use of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating allows for a reduced radiation exposure without a sacrifice in diagnostic efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22212661     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-0006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  42 in total

Review 1.  Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part III: radiation risk and dose reduction.

Authors:  Z Sun; K H Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiang Hsieh; John Londt; Melissa Vass; Jay Li; Xiangyang Tang; Darin Okerlund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Piet K Vanhoenacker; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Ruben Van Heste; Isabel Decramer; Lieven R Van Hoe; William Wijns; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  B A Herzog; C A Wyss; L Husmann; O Gaemperli; I Valenta; V Treyer; U Landmesser; P A Kaufmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Effect of a standardized radiation dose reduction protocol on diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Troy M LaBounty; Jonathon Leipsic; G B John Mancini; Brett Heilbron; Smita Patel; Ella A Kazerooni; Baskaran Sundaram; Fay Y Lin; Allison Dunning; Adam J Saltzman; Giora Weisz; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jin-Ho Choi; Sunaina Koduru; James K Min
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Chenghsun Lin; Robert Davidson; Chiauhuei Dong; Yunchan Liao
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating.

Authors:  William P Shuman; Kelley R Branch; Janet M May; Lee M Mitsumori; Jared N Strote; Bill H Warren; Theodore J Dubinsky; David W Lockhart; James H Caldwell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Tobias Pflederer; Larissa Rudofsky; Dieter Ropers; Sven Bachmann; Mohamed Marwan; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a transformation in cardiovascular CT practice.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Mansour Al Moudi; Yan Cao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  Evidence for prospective ECG-triggering coronary CT angiography in routine practice.

Authors:  Ali Salavati; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 4.  Coronary CT angiography: Dose reduction strategies.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 5.  CT angiography after 20 years: a transformation in cardiovascular disease characterization continues to advance.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Rubin; Jonathon Leipsic; U Joseph Schoepf; Dominik Fleischmann; Sandy Napel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating based on step-and-shoot, Flash and volume modes for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Linfeng Yang; Tao Zhou; Ruijie Zhang; Lin Xu; Zhaohui Peng; Juan Ding; Sen Wang; Min Li; Gang Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Influence of tube potential on quantitative coronary plaque analyses by low radiation dose computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Chunhong Wang; Yuliang Liao; Haibin Chen; Xin Zhen; Jianhong Li; Yikai Xu; Linghong Zhou
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Evaluation of an adaptive detector collimation for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography with third-generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Michael Messerli; Patricia Dewes; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christophe Arendt; Simon Wildermuth; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

10.  Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Yining Wang; U Joseph Schoepf; Felix G Meinel; Richard R Bayer; Li Qi; Jian Cao; Chang Sheng Zhou; Yan E Zhao; Xie Li; Jian Bin Gong; Zhengyu Jin; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.