Literature DB >> 20673144

Bacterial contamination of surgical suture resembles a biofilm.

Michelle J Henry-Stanley1, Donavon J Hess, Aaron M T Barnes, Gary M Dunny, Carol L Wells.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although much attention is currently directed to studying microbial biofilms on a variety of surfaces, few studies are designed to study bacterial growth on surgical suture. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinetic development of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis on five surgical suture materials and to clarify factors that might influence this growth.
METHODS: Pure cultures of S. aureus and E. faecalis were incubated with five types of suture for four days using either tissue culture medium or a bacterial growth medium. Suture-associated bacteria were quantified daily. In selected experiments, the bacterial growth medium was supplemented with heparin, a substance known to promote S. aureus biofilm formation. The ultrastructure of S. aureus biofilm developing on braided suture was studied with scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus and E. faecalis were recovered in greater numbers (typically p < 0.01) from braided than from monofilament suture, and the numbers of bacteria were greater (often p < 0.01) on sutures incubated in bacterial growth medium rather than tissue culture medium. Addition of heparin 1,000 U/mL to silk or braided polyglactin 910 suture incubated three days with S. aureus resulted in greater numbers of bacteria on day one but not on subsequent days. Scanning electron microscopy showed a maturing S. aureus biofilm that developed from small clusters of cells among amorphous material and fibrillar elements to larger clusters of cells that appeared covered by more consolidated extracellular material.
CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial growth was favored on braided vs. monofilament suture, and heparin enhanced bacterial adherence after day one, but not at subsequent times. Staphylococcus aureus adhered to suture material and formed a structure consistent with a bacterial biofilm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20673144      PMCID: PMC2967823          DOI: 10.1089/sur.2010.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1096-2964            Impact factor:   2.150


  22 in total

1.  Plasmid transfer in Streptococcus faecalis: production of multiple sex pheromones by recipients.

Authors:  G M Dunny; R A Craig; R L Carron; D B Clewell
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Biofilms 2003: emerging themes and challenges in studies of surface-associated microbial life.

Authors:  Matthew R Parsek; Clay Fuqua
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate Staphylococcus aureus interactions with intestinal epithelium.

Authors:  Donavon J Hess; Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Stanley L Erlandsen; Carol L Wells
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005-12-24       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Heparin stimulates Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.

Authors:  Robert M Q Shanks; Niles P Donegan; Martha L Graber; Sarah E Buckingham; Michael E Zegans; Ambrose L Cheung; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Effect of suture materials on bacterial survival in infected wounds. An experimental study.

Authors:  B Osterberg; B Blomstedt
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1979

7.  Effects of physical configuration and chemical structure of suture materials on bacterial adhesion. A possible link to wound infection.

Authors:  C C Chu; D F Williams
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection.

Authors:  S Katz; M Izhar; D Mirelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by endothelial cells induces apoptosis.

Authors:  B E Menzies; I Kourteva
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  A systems approach to preoperative surgical patient skin preparation.

Authors:  Lawton A Seal; Deborah Paul-Cheadle
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.918

View more
  20 in total

1.  Gentamicin promotes Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on silk suture.

Authors:  Donavon J Hess; Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Carol L Wells
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Relation between antibiotic susceptibility and ultrastructure of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on surgical suture.

Authors:  Carol L Wells; Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Aaron M T Barnes; Gary M Dunny; Donavon J Hess
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.150

3.  Cleaning with a wet sterile gauze significantly reduces contamination of sutures, instruments, and surgical gloves in an ex-vivo pelvic flexure enterotomy model in horses.

Authors:  Gessica Giusto; Clara Tramuta; Vittorio Caramello; Francesco Comino; Patrizia Nebbia; Patrizia Robino; Ellen Singer; Elena Grego; Marco Gandini
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  The effect of iatrogenic Staphylococcus epidermidis intercellar adhesion operon on the formation of bacterial biofilm on polyvinyl chloride surfaces.

Authors:  Ye Lianhua; Huang Yunchao; Zhao Guangqiang; Yang Kun; Liu Xing; Guo Fengli
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Interplay of antibiotics and bacterial inoculum on suture-associated biofilms.

Authors:  Donavon J Hess; Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Carol L Wells
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  The Natural Surfactant Glycerol Monolaurate Significantly Reduces Development of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms.

Authors:  Donavon J Hess; Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Carol L Wells
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Enterococcus faecalis readily colonizes the entire gastrointestinal tract and forms biofilms in a germ-free mouse model.

Authors:  Aaron M T Barnes; Jennifer L Dale; Yuqing Chen; Dawn A Manias; Kerryl E Greenwood Quaintance; Melissa K Karau; Purna C Kashyap; Robin Patel; Carol L Wells; Gary M Dunny
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.882

8.  Microbiology of explanted suture segments from infected and noninfected surgical patients.

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Candace J Krepel; Richard M Marks; Peter J Rossi; James Sanger; Matthew Goldblatt; Mary Beth Graham; Stephen Rothenburger; John Collier; Gary R Seabrook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation on wound dressings.

Authors:  Kenneth S Brandenburg; Diego F Calderon; Patricia R Kierski; Amanda L Brown; Nihar M Shah; Nicholas L Abbott; Michael J Schurr; Christopher J Murphy; Jonathan F McAnulty; Charles J Czuprynski
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  Bacterial growth kinetics under a novel flexible methacrylate dressing serving as a drug delivery vehicle for antiseptics.

Authors:  Christina Forstner; Johannes Leitgeb; Rupert Schuster; Verena Dosch; Axel Kramer; Keith F Cutting; David J Leaper; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.