Literature DB >> 6364858

Effects of physical configuration and chemical structure of suture materials on bacterial adhesion. A possible link to wound infection.

C C Chu, D F Williams.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of physical configuration and the chemical nature of suture materials on the preferential adherence of bacteria. Ten suture materials of 2-0 (chromic catgut, Dexon, Vicryl, PDS, Mersilene, Tycron, Ethibond, Surgilon, Ethilon, and Prolene) were used. The bacterial strains tested were Staph. aureus and E. coli. The level of bacterial adherence was determined quantitatively by radiolabelled cells and qualitatively by scanning electron microscopy. It was found that the amount of adhered bacteria depended on the type of suture material, the type of bacteria, and the duration of contact. In the group of absorbable sutures, the new PDS sutures exhibited the smallest affinity toward the adherence of both E. coli and Staph. aureus. Dexon sutures had the highest affinity toward these two bacteria. With nonabsorbable sutures, the physical configuration of the sutures contributed more to their ability to attract bacteria than the surface finish. The bacterial adherence on suture materials was also time dependent. Scanning electron microscope morphologic observation also indicated that Staph. aureus adhered on the suture surface in clusters whereas E. coli tended to adhere individually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6364858     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90088-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  29 in total

1.  Intracutaneous versus transcutaneous suture techniques: comparison of sternal wound infection rates in open-heart surgery patients.

Authors:  Ozalp Karabay; Emel Fermanci; Erdem Silistreli; Koray Aykut; Ismail Yurekli; Hudai Catalyurek; Unal Acikel
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

2.  Review: Microbial colonization of prosthetic devices.

Authors:  M Jacques; T J Marrie; J W Costerton
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Miroslav Dragovic; Marko Pejovic; Jelena Stepic; Snjezana Colic; Branko Dozic; Svetlana Dragovic; Milos Lazarevic; Nadja Nikolic; Jelena Milasin; Biljana Milicic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Cleaning with a wet sterile gauze significantly reduces contamination of sutures, instruments, and surgical gloves in an ex-vivo pelvic flexure enterotomy model in horses.

Authors:  Gessica Giusto; Clara Tramuta; Vittorio Caramello; Francesco Comino; Patrizia Nebbia; Patrizia Robino; Ellen Singer; Elena Grego; Marco Gandini
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Bacterial contamination of surgical suture resembles a biofilm.

Authors:  Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Donavon J Hess; Aaron M T Barnes; Gary M Dunny; Carol L Wells
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.150

6.  Incidence of postoperative wound infections after open tendo Achilles repairs.

Authors:  Mohd Mizan Marican; Stephanie Man Chung Fook-Chong; Inderjeet Singh Rikhraj
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Comparison of anti-fouling surface coatings for applications in bacteremia diagnostics.

Authors:  Anna K Boardman; Sandra Allison; Andre Sharon; Alexis F Sauer-Budge
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  A comparative study of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in colonic anastomoses in rats.

Authors:  E Andersen; K Søndenaa; J Holter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imamura; Kensuke Adachi; Ritsuko Sasaki; Satoko Monma; Sadaaki Shioiri; Yasuji Seyama; Masaru Miura; Yoshihiko Morikawa; Tetsuji Kaneko
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; Sharon L Stein; Fabrizio Michelassi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.