Literature DB >> 28154467

Cleaning with a wet sterile gauze significantly reduces contamination of sutures, instruments, and surgical gloves in an ex-vivo pelvic flexure enterotomy model in horses.

Gessica Giusto1, Clara Tramuta1, Vittorio Caramello1, Francesco Comino1, Patrizia Nebbia1, Patrizia Robino1, Ellen Singer1, Elena Grego1, Marco Gandini1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether cleaning surgical materials used to close pelvic flexure enterotomies with a wet sterile gauze will reduce contamination and whether the use of a full thickness appositional suture pattern (F) or a partial thickness inverting (or Cushing) suture pattern (C) would make a difference in the level of contamination. Large colon specimens were assigned to group F or C and divided into subgroups N and G. In group G, a wet sterile gauze was passed over the suture material, another over the instruments, and another over the gloves. In group N, no treatment was applied. The bacterial concentration was measured by optical density (OD) at 24 h. The OD of subgroup CG was lower than that of subgroup CN (P = 0.019). The OD of subgroup FG was lower than that of subgroup FN (P = 0.02). The OD of subgroups CG, CN, FG, and FN was lower than that of the negative control (P < 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.00). The use of a sterile wet gauze significantly reduced contamination of suture materials. A partial thickness inverting suture pattern did not produce less contamination than a full thickness appositional suture pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28154467      PMCID: PMC5220602     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  19 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic resistance in common pathogens reinforces the need to minimise surgical site infections.

Authors:  P M Dohmen
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Bacterial contamination of surgical suture resembles a biofilm.

Authors:  Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Donavon J Hess; Aaron M T Barnes; Gary M Dunny; Carol L Wells
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.150

3.  Bacteria adhere less to barbed monofilament than braided sutures in a contaminated wound model.

Authors:  John R Fowler; Tiffany A Perkins; Bettina A Buttaro; Allan L Truant
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Surgical site infections linked to contaminated surgical instruments.

Authors:  S J Dancer; M Stewart; C Coulombe; A Gregori; M Virdi
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Effects of physical configuration and chemical structure of suture materials on bacterial adhesion. A possible link to wound infection.

Authors:  C C Chu; D F Williams
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection.

Authors:  S Katz; M Izhar; D Mirelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Bacterial colonization on different suture materials--a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery.

Authors:  J-E Otten; M Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad; H Jahnke; K Pelz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  A study of the efficacy of antibacterial sutures for surgical site infection: a retrospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Seiichiro Hoshino; Yoichiro Yoshida; Syu Tanimura; Yasushi Yamauchi; Tomoaki Noritomi; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun

9.  Microbiology of explanted suture segments from infected and noninfected surgical patients.

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Candace J Krepel; Richard M Marks; Peter J Rossi; James Sanger; Matthew Goldblatt; Mary Beth Graham; Stephen Rothenburger; John Collier; Gary R Seabrook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention.

Authors:  C D Owens; K Stoessel
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.