Literature DB >> 22682712

Interplay of antibiotics and bacterial inoculum on suture-associated biofilms.

Donavon J Hess1, Michelle J Henry-Stanley, Carol L Wells.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biofilms are often antibiotic resistant, and it is unclear if prophylactic antibiotics can effectively prevent biofilm formation. Experiments were designed to test the ability of high (bactericidal) concentrations of ampicillin (AMP), vancomycin (VAN), and oxacillin (OXA) to prevent formation of suture-associated biofilms initiated with low (10(4)) and high (10(7)) numbers of Staphylococcus aureus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: S. aureus biofilms were cultivated overnight on silk suture incubated in biofilm growth medium supplemented with bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA. Standard microbiological methods were used to quantify total numbers of viable suture-associated S. aureus. Crystal violet staining followed by spectroscopy was used to quantify biofilm biomass, which includes bacterial cells plus matrix components. To observe the effects of antibiotics on the microscopic appearance of biofilm formation, biofilms were cultivated on glass slides, then stained with fluorescent dyes, and observed by confocal microscopy.
RESULTS: In the presence of a relatively low inoculum (10(4)) of S. aureus cells, bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA were effective in preventing development of suture-associated biofilms. However, similar concentrations of these antibiotics were typically ineffective in preventing biofilm development on sutures inoculated with 10(7)S. aureus, a concentration relevant to contaminated skin. Confocal microscopy confirmed that bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA inhibited, but did not prevent, development of S. aureus biofilms.
CONCLUSION: Bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA inhibited formation of suture-associated biofilms initiated with low numbers (10(4)), but not high numbers (10(7)), of S. aureus cells.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22682712      PMCID: PMC3498097          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  16 in total

Review 1.  Survival strategies of infectious biofilms.

Authors:  C A Fux; J W Costerton; P S Stewart; P Stoodley
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 2.  Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease.

Authors:  Kim Lewis
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 3.  Evolving concepts in biofilm infections.

Authors:  Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 4.  The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review.

Authors:  Russell D Monds; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 5.  Staphylococcal cell wall: morphogenesis and fatal variations in the presence of penicillin.

Authors:  P Giesbrecht; T Kersten; H Maidhof; J Wecke
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Relation between antibiotic susceptibility and ultrastructure of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on surgical suture.

Authors:  Carol L Wells; Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Aaron M T Barnes; Gary M Dunny; Donavon J Hess
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Heparin stimulates Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.

Authors:  Robert M Q Shanks; Niles P Donegan; Martha L Graber; Sarah E Buckingham; Michael E Zegans; Ambrose L Cheung; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Lucas R Hoffman; David A D'Argenio; Michael J MacCoss; Zhaoying Zhang; Roger A Jones; Samuel I Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates.

Authors:  Elke Peeters; Hans J Nelis; Tom Coenye
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.363

10.  Immunochemical properties of the staphylococcal poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide.

Authors:  Tomás Maira-Litrán; Andrea Kropec; C Abeygunawardana; Joseph Joyce; George Mark; Donald A Goldmann; Gerald B Pier
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Ventricular shunt infections: immunopathogenesis and clinical management.

Authors:  Yenis Gutierrez-Murgas; Jessica N Snowden
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.478

2.  Use of affinity allows anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial dual release that matches suture wound resolution.

Authors:  Rebecca M Haley; Victoria R Qian; Greg D Learn; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  The Natural Surfactant Glycerol Monolaurate Significantly Reduces Development of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms.

Authors:  Donavon J Hess; Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Carol L Wells
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  Bacterial adhesion and growth reduction by novel rubber-derived oligomers.

Authors:  Hope T Badawy; Pamela Pasetto; Jean-Luc Mouget; Jean-François Pilard; Teresa J Cutright; Amy Milsted
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Non-aqueous glycerol monolaurate gel exhibits antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mueller; Patrick M Schlievert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.