Literature DB >> 539325

Effect of suture materials on bacterial survival in infected wounds. An experimental study.

B Osterberg, B Blomstedt.   

Abstract

A non-capilllary and a capillary suture material were compared as regards the course of Staphylococcus areus infection at the site of implantation. The materials were implanted in the muscle of the rat, and bacterial counts were made at intervals over 41 days. The number of bacteria recovered at the implantation site during the test period decreased steadily and was significantly lower for the non-capillary than for the capillary materials. In the latter case the bacterial counts did not fall far below the initial value at inoculation. The number of bacteria isolated from the suture thread in relation to the total number from the thread and the surrounding muscle was significantly greater for the capillary material. The difference in the results for the two types of suture materials might be ascribed to differences in the extent to which the bacteria are exposed to the body's defence mechanism; in the case of the capillary suture material the bacteria would tend to be protected through their enclosure in the interstices of the material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 539325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Scand        ISSN: 0001-5482


  14 in total

1.  Surgipro mesh: not all multifilaments are the same.

Authors:  George T Rodeheaver
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06

2.  Outcome of surgical zipper technique.

Authors:  John E Onuminya; Ewan Alufohai; Dorcas S Onuminya
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Bacterial contamination of surgical suture resembles a biofilm.

Authors:  Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Donavon J Hess; Aaron M T Barnes; Gary M Dunny; Carol L Wells
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  Bacterial biofilms on implanted suture material are a cause of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Sandeep Kathju; Laura Nistico; Irene Tower; Leslie-Ann Lasko; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Healthcare associated infection: novel strategies and antimicrobial implants to prevent surgical site infection.

Authors:  David Leaper; Andrew J McBain; Axel Kramer; Ojan Assadian; Jose Luis Alfonso Sanchez; Jukka Lumio; Martin Kiernan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Antimicrobial sutures and prevention of surgical site infection: assessment of the safety of the antiseptic triclosan.

Authors:  David Leaper; Ojan Assadian; Nils-Olaf Hubner; Andrew McBain; Thomas Barbolt; Stephen Rothenburger; Peter Wilson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  A comparative study of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in colonic anastomoses in rats.

Authors:  E Andersen; K Søndenaa; J Holter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Antibacterial protection of suture material by chlorhexidine-functionalized polyelectrolyte multilayer films.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Harnet; Erell Le Guen; Vincent Ball; Henri Tenenbaum; Joelle Ogier; Youssef Haikel; Constant Vodouhê
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Infections in neurosurgery: a randomized comparison between silk and polyglycolic acid.

Authors:  G C Blomstedt
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Microbiology of explanted suture segments from infected and noninfected surgical patients.

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Candace J Krepel; Richard M Marks; Peter J Rossi; James Sanger; Matthew Goldblatt; Mary Beth Graham; Stephen Rothenburger; John Collier; Gary R Seabrook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.