Literature DB >> 23175247

Microbiology of explanted suture segments from infected and noninfected surgical patients.

Charles E Edmiston1, Candace J Krepel, Richard M Marks, Peter J Rossi, James Sanger, Matthew Goldblatt, Mary Beth Graham, Stephen Rothenburger, John Collier, Gary R Seabrook.   

Abstract

Sutures under selective host/environmental factors can potentiate postoperative surgical site infection (SSI). The present investigation characterized microbial recovery and biofilm formation from explanted absorbable (AB) and nonabsorbable (NAB) sutures from infected and noninfected sites. AB and NAB sutures were harvested from noninfected (70.9%) and infected (29.1%) sites in 158 patients. At explantation, devices were sonicated and processed for qualitative/quantitative bacteriology; selective sutures were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bacteria were recovered from 85 (53.8%) explanted sites; 39 sites were noninfected, and 46 were infected. Suture recovery ranged from 11.1 to 574.6 days postinsertion. A significant difference in mean microbial recovery between noninfected (1.2 isolates) and infected (2.7 isolates) devices (P < 0.05) was noted. Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), Peptostreptococcus spp., Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia spp. were recovered from infected devices, while commensal skin flora was recovered from noninfected devices. No significant difference in quantitative microbial recovery between infected monofilament and multifilament sutures was noted. Biofilm was present in 100% and 66.6% of infected and noninfected devices, respectively (P < 0.042). We conclude that both monofilament and braided sutures provide a hospitable surface for microbial adherence: (i) a significant difference in microbial recovery from infected and noninfected sutures was noted, (ii) infected sutures harbored a mixed flora, including multidrug-resistant health care-associated pathogens, and (iii) a significant difference in the presence or absence of a biofilm in infected versus noninfected explanted devices was noted. Further studies to document the benefit of focused risk reduction strategies to minimize suture contamination and biofilm formation postimplantation are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175247      PMCID: PMC3553868          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02442-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  The virulence of Staphylococcus pyogenes for man; a study of the problems of wound infection.

Authors:  S D ELEK; P E CONEN
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1957-12

2.  Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Gary R Seabrook; Michael P Goheen; Candace J Krepel; Christopher P Johnson; Brian D Lewis; Kellie R Brown; Jonathan B Towne
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Reducing the risk of infection in vascular access patients: an in vitro evaluation of an antimicrobial silver nanotechnology luer activated device.

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Vera Markina
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Reducing the risk of surgical site infections: did we really think SCIP was going to lead us to the promised land?

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Maureen Spencer; Brian D Lewis; Kellie R Brown; Peter J Rossi; Cindy R Henen; Heidi W Smith; Gary R Seabrook
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Bacterial contamination of surgical suture resembles a biofilm.

Authors:  Michelle J Henry-Stanley; Donavon J Hess; Aaron M T Barnes; Gary M Dunny; Carol L Wells
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.150

6.  The effect of local infection upon wound healing: an experimental study.

Authors:  T E Bucknall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection.

Authors:  S Katz; M Izhar; D Mirelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Using biofilms as initial inocula in animal models of biofilm-related infections.

Authors:  Dustin L Williams; J William Costerton
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

10.  In vivo antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan).

Authors:  Xintian Ming; Michele Nichols; Stephen Rothenburger
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.150

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cleaning with a wet sterile gauze significantly reduces contamination of sutures, instruments, and surgical gloves in an ex-vivo pelvic flexure enterotomy model in horses.

Authors:  Gessica Giusto; Clara Tramuta; Vittorio Caramello; Francesco Comino; Patrizia Nebbia; Patrizia Robino; Ellen Singer; Elena Grego; Marco Gandini
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Propionibacterium avidum infection following breast reduction: high morbidity from a low-virulence pathogen.

Authors:  Pietro G di Summa; Adrien Yvon; Lorenz Larcher; Wassim Raffoul; Nathalie Koch
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-10

3.  Next Generation Sequencing Analysis of Biofilms from Three Dogs with Postoperative Surgical Site Infection.

Authors:  L M König; R Klopfleisch; D Höper; A D Gruber
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of sutures coated with triclosan for the prevention of surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery according to the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  Marta Sandini; Ilaria Mattavelli; Luca Nespoli; Fabio Uggeri; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Evaluation of the effect of triclosan coated sutures in the prevention of surgical site infections in a Spanish hospital setting: A prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Manuel Bustamante Montalvo; Miguel Cainzos; Luis Prieto Carreiras; Andrea Castiñeira Piñeiro; Adrián García Iglesias; Ana Fernandez Novo; Lara María González Gómez; Ana Flores; Rita Diz Gil; Carlos Fernández Baltar
Journal:  Infect Prev Pract       Date:  2021-06-07

6.  Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation on wound dressings.

Authors:  Kenneth S Brandenburg; Diego F Calderon; Patricia R Kierski; Amanda L Brown; Nihar M Shah; Nicholas L Abbott; Michael J Schurr; Christopher J Murphy; Jonathan F McAnulty; Charles J Czuprynski
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus simulans Causing Surgical Site Infection.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Qiang Fang
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-06-16

8.  Bacterial inhibition potential of quaternised chitosan-coated VICRYL absorbable suture: An in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Ying Yang; Sheng-Bing Yang; Yu-Gang Wang; Shu-Hong Zhang; Zhi-Feng Yu; Ting-Ting Tang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Prevention of bacterial colonization on non-thermal atmospheric plasma treated surgical sutures for control and prevention of surgical site infections.

Authors:  Utku Kürşat Ercan; Fatma İbiş; Caner Dikyol; Nesrin Horzum; Ozan Karaman; Çağla Yıldırım; Elif Çukur; Emine Afra Demirci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of the Risk and Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Surgery Using a US Longitudinal Database: Is There a Role for Innovative Antimicrobial Wound Closure Technology to Reduce the Risk of Infection?

Authors:  David J Leaper; Chantal E Holy; Maureen Spencer; Abhishek Chitnis; Andrew Hogan; George W J Wright; Brian Po-Han Chen; Charles E Edmiston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.