Literature DB >> 26382003

Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Charles C-F Or, Matthew F Peterson, Miguel P Eckstein.   

Abstract

Culture influences not only human high-level cognitive processes but also low-level perceptual operations. Some perceptual operations, such as initial eye movements to faces, are critical for extraction of information supporting evolutionarily important tasks such as face identification. The extent of cultural effects on these crucial perceptual processes is unknown. Here, we report that the first gaze location for face identification was similar across East Asian and Western Caucasian cultural groups: Both fixated a featureless point between the eyes and the nose, with smaller between-group than within-group differences and with a small horizontal difference across cultures (8% of the interocular distance). We also show that individuals of both cultural groups initially fixated at a slightly higher point on Asian faces than on Caucasian faces. The initial fixations were found to be both fundamental in acquiring the majority of information for face identification and optimal, as accuracy deteriorated when observers held their gaze away from their preferred fixations. An ideal observer that integrated facial information with the human visual system's varying spatial resolution across the visual field showed a similar information distribution across faces of both races and predicted initial human fixations. The model consistently replicated the small vertical difference between human fixations to Asian and Caucasian faces but did not predict the small horizontal leftward bias of Caucasian observers. Together, the results suggest that initial eye movements during face identification may be driven by brain mechanisms aimed at maximizing accuracy, and less influenced by culture. The findings increase our understanding of the interplay between the brain's aims to optimally accomplish basic perceptual functions and to respond to sociocultural influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26382003      PMCID: PMC4578600          DOI: 10.1167/15.13.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  43 in total

1.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment.

Authors:  L J Ji; K Peng; R E Nisbett
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-05

Review 2.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.

Authors:  R E Nisbett; K Peng; I Choi; A Norenzayan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception.

Authors:  Hannah Faye Chua; Julie E Boland; Richard E Nisbett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search.

Authors:  Jiri Najemnik; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception.

Authors:  Richard E Nisbett; Yuri Miyamoto
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans.

Authors:  Ute Leonards; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns?

Authors:  S Butler; I D Gilchrist; D M Burt; D I Perrett; E Jones; M Harvey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms.

Authors:  Yani Zhang; Binh T Pham; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  10 in total

1.  Foveal processing of emotion-informative facial features.

Authors:  Nazire Duran; Anthony P Atkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Domain Specificity of Oculomotor Learning after Changes in Sensory Processing.

Authors:  Yuliy Tsank; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Where You Look Matters for Body Perception: Preferred Gaze Location Contributes to the Body Inversion Effect.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L McKean; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Even subtle cultural differences affect face tuning.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Julie Heiz; Alexander N Sokolov; Andreas J Fallgatter; Koviljka Barisnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Eye Movement Dynamics Differ between Encoding and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L Noles; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 6.  How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

7.  Differences in Looking at Own- and Other-Race Faces Are Subtle and Analysis-Dependent: An Account of Discrepant Reports.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Dwight J Kravitz; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Time Course of Cultural Differences in Spatial Frequency Use for Face Identification.

Authors:  Amanda Estéphan; Daniel Fiset; Camille Saumure; Marie-Pier Plouffe-Demers; Ye Zhang; Dan Sun; Caroline Blais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Initial eye gaze to faces and its functional consequence on face identification abilities in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Kimberly B Schauder; Woon Ju Park; Yuliy Tsank; Miguel P Eckstein; Duje Tadin; Loisa Bennetto
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Rapid saccadic categorization of other-race faces.

Authors:  Peter de Lissa; Nayla Sokhn; Sasha Lasrado; Kanji Tanaka; Katsumi Watanabe; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.