Literature DB >> 21463086

Eye movements and word skipping during reading: effects of word length and predictability.

Keith Rayner1, Timothy J Slattery, Denis Drieghe, Simon P Liversedge.   

Abstract

Eye movements were monitored as subjects read sentences containing high- or low-predictable target words. The extent to which target words were predictable from prior context was varied: Half of the target words were predictable, and the other half were unpredictable. In addition, the length of the target word varied: The target words were short (4-6 letters), medium (7-9 letters), or long (10-12 letters). Length and predictability both yielded strong effects on the probability of skipping the target words and on the amount of time readers fixated the target words (when they were not skipped). However, there was no interaction in any of the measures examined for either skipping or fixation time. The results demonstrate that word predictability (due to contextual constraint) and word length have strong and independent influences on word skipping and fixation durations. Furthermore, because the long words extended beyond the word identification span, the data indicate that skipping can occur on the basis of partial information in relation to word identity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21463086      PMCID: PMC3543826          DOI: 10.1037/a0020990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara Juhasz; Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

6.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; K Rayner; D A Balota
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

9.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more
  38 in total

1.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Michelle Lee; Michael Reiderman; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Gemma Fitzsimmons; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

4.  Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural reading.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-14

6.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Stress matters revisited: a boundary change experiment.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Using E-Z reader to examine word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.