Literature DB >> 20663464

Pilot study for assessment of optimal frequency for changing catheters in insulin pump therapy-trouble starts on day 3.

Volkmar Schmid1, Cloth Hohberg, Marcus Borchert, Thomas Forst, Andreas Pfützner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) by means of insulin pump devices is considered to be one of the most optimal therapies to achieve treatment targets in patients with diabetes mellitus. In CSII, the insulin is delivered through Teflon catheters or steel needle infusion sets, which need to be renewed on a regular basis. This pilot study was performed to investigate the optimal change frequency in daily practice and to explore potential problems that may occur when the sets are used for a more prolonged time than the recommended up to 72 hours of usage (Teflon catheters).
METHOD: Twelve patients with type 1 diabetes participated in the trial [age (mean +/- STD): 40.3 +/- 12.6 years, body mass index: 26.2 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2), hemoglobin A1c: 6.7 +/- 0.6%]. They were asked to wear their infusion set (Comfort or Silhouette) for increasing periods of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. After each use, patients completed standardized questionnaires regarding technical and medical issues associated with infusion set use. A health care professional investigated the infusion sites and infusion sets and completed an "infusion set inspection" questionnaire. Blood glucose was measured and recorded to assess a potential influence of duration of catheter use on glycemic control.
RESULTS: Infusion set and injection site problems (itching, bruising, swelling, and pain) started to occur in measurable amounts on the 3rd day of catheter use, and about 40% of patients reported significant issues when using a catheter for 5 days. In parallel, there was a consistent increase in mean daily blood glucose levels that correlated with the number of days of catheter use (e.g., day 1: 7.5 +/- 3.8 mmol/liter, day 3: 8.4 +/- 4.2 mmol/liter, day 5: 9.0 +/- 4.0 mmol/liter, day 7: 11.6 +/- 2.2 mmol/liter, p < 0.05 vs day 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Using the catheters for 2 days resulted in a safe and well-tolerated therapy. Clinically relevant adverse events started to occur during the 3rd day and their incidence increased constantly with longer use. This was associated with undesired changes in mean glycemic control. Data support the recommendation by the drug and device manufacturers that insulin pump catheters should only be used for 48-72 hours to avoid adverse events and potential metabolic deterioration. 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663464      PMCID: PMC2909532          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  23 in total

1.  Laboratory-based non-clinical comparison of occlusion rates using three rapid-acting insulin analogs in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion catheters using low flow rates.

Authors:  David Kerr; John Morton; Caroline Whately-Smith; Joan Everett; Joe P Begley
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

2.  Local skin reaction caused by the plastic catheter tubing of the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion system.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J W Burnett
Journal:  Cutis       Date:  1988-05

Review 3.  [Present role of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) by insulin pump in the treatment of diabetes mellitus].

Authors:  A Pfützner; S Berger; G Spinas
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  2000-12-02

4.  Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection regimens using insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients on intensified treatment: a randomized study. The Study Group for the Development of Pump Therapy in Diabetes.

Authors:  H Hanaire-Broutin; V Melki; S Bessières-Lacombe; J P Tauber
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) 30 years later: still the best option for insulin therapy.

Authors:  Daniela Bruttomesso; Silvana Costa; Aldo Baritussio
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 6.  Skin-related complications of insulin therapy: epidemiology and emerging management strategies.

Authors:  Tristan Richardson; David Kerr
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.403

7.  Reduction to normal of plasma glucose in juvenile diabetes by subcutaneous administration of insulin with a portable infusion pump.

Authors:  W V Tamborlane; R S Sherwin; M Genel; P Felig
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Effect of steel and teflon infusion catheters on subcutaneous adipose tissue blood flow and infusion counter pressure in humans.

Authors:  Lise Højbjerre; Camilla Skov-Jensen; Peter Kaastrup; Per Elgård Pedersen; Bente Stallknecht
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 9.  Long-acting insulin analogs versus insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  John C Pickup; Eric Renard
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Bacterial strains colonizing subcutaneous catheters of personal insulin pumps.

Authors:  Maria Nowakowska; Przemysława Jarosz-Chobot; Joanna Polańska; Łukasz Machnica
Journal:  Pol J Microbiol       Date:  2007
View more
  35 in total

1.  Longer Usage Time for CSII Catheters: An Underestimated Challenge.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Daniela Sachsenheimer; Marco Grenningloh
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 2.  Moving Toward a Unified Platform for Insulin Delivery and Sensing of Inputs Relevant to an Artificial Pancreas.

Authors:  Anneke Graf; Sybil A McAuley; Catriona Sims; Johanna Ulloa; Alicia J Jenkins; Gayane Voskanyan; David N O'Neal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-13

3.  Randomized trial of infusion set function: steel versus teflon.

Authors:  Parul J Patel; Kari Benasi; Gina Ferrari; Mark G Evans; Satya Shanmugham; Darrell M Wilson; Bruce A Buckingham
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Patch pump versus conventional pump: postprandial glycemic excursions and the influence of wear time.

Authors:  Yoeri M Luijf; Sabine Arnolds; Angelo Avogaro; Carsten Benesch; Daniela Bruttomesso; Anne Farret; Lutz Heinemann; Jerome Place; Eric Renard; Rachele Scotton; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Analysis of the environmental impact of insulin infusion sets based on loss of resources with waste.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Petra B Musholt; Bjoern Malmgren-Hansen; Nils H Nilsson; Thomas Forst
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

6.  Tissue Response to Subcutaneous Infusion Catheter.

Authors:  Ershuai Zhang; Zhiqiang Cao
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-31

7.  Establishing Methods to Determine Clinically Relevant Bolus and Basal Rate Delivery Accuracy of Insulin Pumps.

Authors:  Ulrike Kamecke; Delia Waldenmaier; Cornelia Haug; Ralph Ziegler; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-13

8.  We Need More Research and Better Designs for Insulin Infusion Sets.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; John Walsh; Ruth Roberts
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-27

9.  Early Detection of Infusion Set Failure During Insulin Pump Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Marzia Cescon; Daniel J DeSalvo; Trang T Ly; David M Maahs; Laurel H Messer; Bruce A Buckingham; Francis J Doyle; Eyal Dassau
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-01

10.  Randomized Cross-Over Study Comparing Two Infusion Sets for CSII in Daily Life.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Stephan Arndt; Albrecht Fießelmann; Gerhard Klausmann; Kristina Pralle; Thomas Künsting; Bettina Petersen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.