Literature DB >> 19885209

Laboratory-based non-clinical comparison of occlusion rates using three rapid-acting insulin analogs in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion catheters using low flow rates.

David Kerr1, John Morton, Caroline Whately-Smith, Joan Everett, Joe P Begley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid-acting analog insulin is used increasingly for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy (CSII). As the choice of insulin may be a determinant of catheter occlusion, we compared rates of early and late occlusion of a standard CSII catheter with three insulin analogs in a laboratory-based setting.
METHODS: Twenty-four pumps were used for the study. Each insulin analog (glulisine, lispro, and aspart) was assigned to eight pumps in a randomized order for each of nine runs of 5-day duration. Pumps were primed to receive a basal dose of 0.1 IU/h with a bolus dose of 2 IU given three times each day. Pumps were placed in an incubator to maintain temperature in the range of 32 to 36 degrees C.
RESULTS: Over the entire study period, there were 48 occlusions. Early occlusions (within 72 hours) occurred during five of the nine runs with no evidence of any difference between insulins (p = .27); there were no occlusions before 48 hours. Over the whole of the 5-day infusion period, the probabilities of overall occlusion for each insulin were 40.9% [28 to 55%, 95% confidence interval (CI)] for glulisine, 9.2% (4 to 19.5%, 95% CI) for aspart, and 15.7% (8.1 to 28.1%, 95% CI) for lispro. All occlusions, except for three, occurred during a bolus infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: During CSII under laboratory conditions, early catheter occlusions (within 72 hours) are rare and independent of the choice of insulin analog. For patients using insulin pump therapy, the importance of catheter change within 72 hours should be emphasized irrespective of the insulin used. Beyond 72 hours, the risk of occlusion differs between insulins, being more common with glulisine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSII; analogs; insulin; occlusions; temperature

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885209      PMCID: PMC2769745          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

1.  Metabolic decompensation in pump users due to lispro insulin precipitation.

Authors:  Howard A Wolpert; Raquel N Faradji; Susan Bonner-Weir; Myra A Lipes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

2.  In vitro stability of insulin aspart in simulated continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using a MiniMed 508 insulin pump.

Authors:  J Senstius; E Harboe; H Westermann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Technical risks with subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  I Guilhem; A M Leguerrier; F Lecordier; J Y Poirier; D Maugendre
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.041

4.  In vitro stability of insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  Michael R DeFelippis; Maureen A Bell; Jennifer A Heyob; Sacha M Storms
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 5.  Toward understanding insulin fibrillation.

Authors:  J Brange; L Andersen; E D Laursen; G Meyn; E Rasmussen
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Safety of insulin glulisine when given by continuous subcutaneous infusion using an external pump in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  R P Hoogma; D Schumicki
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.936

7.  Insulin pump therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Jeanne Antisdel-Lomaglio; Roopa Seshadri
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Comparison of insulin aspart with buffered regular insulin and insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized study in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Bruce Bode; Richard Weinstein; David Bell; Janet McGill; Daniel Nadeau; Philip Raskin; Jaime Davidson; Robert Henry; Won-Chin Huang; Rickey R Reinhardt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-acting insulin analogues in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Johannes Plank; Andrea Siebenhofer; Andrea Berghold; Klaus Jeitler; Karl Horvath; Peter Mrak; Thomas R Pieber
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-27
  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  CSII: Longer Catheter Usage Time, a Reasonable Goal.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Ardilouze; Julie Ménard; Fernand Gobeil; Maude Gagnon-Auger; Ghislaine Houde; Marie-Hélène Pesant; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret; Jean-Patrice Baillargeon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

2.  Evaluation of Intradermal and Subcutaneous Infusion Set Performance Under 24-Hour Basal and Bolus Conditions.

Authors:  Elaine McVey; Steven Keith; Joshua K Herr; Diane Sutter; Ronald J Pettis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-27

Review 3.  Stability and performance of rapid-acting insulin analogs used for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Kerr; Erik Wizemann; Jakob Senstius; Mette Zacho; Francisco Javier Ampudia-Blasco
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

4.  Analysis of the environmental impact of insulin infusion sets based on loss of resources with waste.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Petra B Musholt; Bjoern Malmgren-Hansen; Nils H Nilsson; Thomas Forst
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 5.  Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time.

Authors:  Chantal Mathieu; Pieter Gillard; Katrien Benhalima
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Characterizing normal-use temperature conditions of pumped insulin.

Authors:  Joshua K Herr; Steven Keith; Rick Klug; Ronald J Pettis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-12

7.  Multicenter user evaluation of ACCU-CHEK® Combo, an integrated system for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  David Kerr; Roel P L M Hoogma; Andreas Buhr; Bettina Petersen; Fred E M G Storms
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

Review 8.  Insulin infusion set: the Achilles heel of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Lars Krinelke
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

9.  Using Insulin Infusion Sets in CSII for Longer Than the Recommended Usage Time Leads to a High Risk for Adverse Events: Results From a Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Daniela Sachsenheimer; Marco Grenningloh; Matthias Heschel; Lene Walther-Johannesen; Rabi Gharabli; David Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-03

10.  Nonmetabolic complications of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a patient survey.

Authors:  John C Pickup; Nardos Yemane; Anna Brackenridge; Siobhan Pender
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.