Literature DB >> 20649217

Evaluating auditory brainstem responses to different chirp stimuli at three levels of stimulation.

Claus Elberling1, Johannes Callø, Manuel Don.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) are recorded in ten normal-hearing adults (20 ears) in response to a standard 100 micros click and five chirps having different durations (sweeping rates). The chirps are constructed from five versions of a power function model of the cochlear-neural delay that is based on derived-band ABR latencies from N=81 normal-hearing adults [Elberling, C., and Don, M. (2008). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3022-3037]. The click and the chirps have identical amplitude spectra and, in general, for each of the three stimulus levels 60, 40, and 20 dB nHL, the ABRs to the chirps are significantly larger than the ABRs to the click. However, the shorter chirps are the most efficient at higher levels of stimulation whereas the longer chirps are the most efficient at lower levels. It is suggested that two different mechanisms are responsible for these observed changes with stimulus level--(1) upward spread of excitation at higher levels, and (2) an increased change of the cochlear-neural delay with frequency at lower levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649217      PMCID: PMC3188598          DOI: 10.1121/1.3397640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses.

Authors:  M Don; C Elberling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli.

Authors:  S T Neely; S J Norton; M P Gorga; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts.

Authors:  S E Shore; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity.

Authors:  J J Eggermont; M Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency specificity of human auditory brainstem responses as revealed by pure-tone masking profiles.

Authors:  R C Folsom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  C Elberling; M Don
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1984

9.  Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference.

Authors:  C Elberling; O Wahlgreen
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1985

10.  Narrow-band AP latencies in normal and recruiting human ears.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  [On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Sinnet G B Kristensen; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Bo-Chen Wang; Yong Liang; Xiao-Long Liu; Jing Zhao; You-Li Liu; Yan-Fei Li; Wei Zhang; Qi Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  CE-Chirp® ABR in cerebellopontine angle surgery neuromonitoring: technical assessment in four cases.

Authors:  Ettore Di Scipio; Luciano Mastronardi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  [Objective frequency-specific measurement of hearing threshold using narrow-band chirp stimuli with level-adaptive simultaneous masking].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Judy Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Mapping auditory nerve firing density using high-level compound action potentials and high-pass noise masking.

Authors:  Brian R Earl; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; Alexander Hardy; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.