Literature DB >> 7983280

Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses.

M Don1, C Elberling.   

Abstract

The nature of the residual background noise in ABR averages was empirically examined in normal hearing objects. The residual noise in the average was estimated with use of the technique described by Elberling and Don [Scand. Audiol. 13, 187-197 (1984)]. Low-level click stimuli were presented in 2-dB steps spanning the range from 30 to 48 dB p-p.e. SPL. For each stimulus level, 10,000 sweeps were acquired and stored for analysis. Shortcomings of the use of artifact rejection and standard averaging are demonstrated. It is further demonstrated how application of the Bayesian estimation technique of Elberling and Wahlgreen [Scand. Audiol. 14, 89-96 (1985)] to form weighted averages can help minimize these shortcomings. Finally, the effects of smaller sweep block sizes on the Bayesian technique's ability to control the destructive effects of nonstationary noise are analyzed. Minimizing the destructive effects increases the value of statistical techniques used to detect objectively or to control the quality of ABR recordings. In all, these techniques in combination improve not only the accuracy of test interpretation but also the efficiency of clinical test time, which is becoming important for the control of medical costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7983280     DOI: 10.1121/1.411281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Sinnet G B Kristensen; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating auditory brainstem responses to different chirp stimuli at three levels of stimulation.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Johannes Callø; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Measurement of signal and noise characteristics in ongoing auditory brainstem response averaging.

Authors:  O Ozdamar; R E Delgado
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

9.  Hearing it again and again: on-line subcortical plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xiao; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.