Literature DB >> 22423705

Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.

Claus Elberling1, Sinnet G B Kristensen, Manuel Don.   

Abstract

The frequency response and sensitivity of the ER-3A and ER-2 insert earphones are measured in the occluded-ear simulator using three ear canal extensions. Compared to the other two extensions, the DB 0370 (Brüel & Kjær), which is recommended by the international standards, introduces a significant resonance peak around 4500 Hz. The ER-3A has an amplitude response like a band-pass filter (1400 Hz, 6 dB/octave -4000 Hz, -36 dB/octave), and a group delay with "ripples" of up to ±0.5 ms, while the ER-2 has an amplitude response, and a group delay which are flat and smooth up to above 10000 Hz. Both earphones are used to record auditory brainstem responses, ABRs, from 22 normal-hearing ears in response to two chirps and a click at levels from 20 to 80 dB nHL. While the click-ABRs are slightly larger for ER-2 than for ER-3A, the chirp-ABRs are much larger for ER-2 than for ER-3A at levels below 60 dB nHL. With a simulated amplitude response of the ER-3A and the smooth group delay of the ER-2 it is shown that the increased chirp-ABR amplitude with the ER-2 is caused by its broader amplitude response and not by its smoother group delay.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22423705      PMCID: PMC3316682          DOI: 10.1121/1.3677257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Evaluating auditory brainstem responses to different chirp stimuli at three levels of stimulation.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Johannes Callø; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment using 'clicks' as test signals.

Authors:  Utz Richter; Thomas Fedtke
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Influence of cochlear traveling wave and neural adaptation on auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Dirk Junius; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The post-auricular muscle response: an objective electrophysiological method for evaluating hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Katrina B Agung; David Hartley; Robert B Patuzzi; Greg A O'Beirne
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Rising-frequency chirps and earphones with an extended high-frequency response enhance the post-auricular muscle response.

Authors:  Katrina Agung; Suzanne C Purdy; Robert B Patuzzi; Greg A O'Beirne; Philip Newall
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Stimulus repetition rate and the reference levels for clicks and short tone bursts: a warning to audiologists, researchers, calibration laboratories, and equipment manufacturers.

Authors:  Guy Lightfoot; Yvonne Sininger; Robert Burkard; Andre Lodwig
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  New clicklike stimuli for hearing testing.

Authors:  Mario Cebulla; Ekkehard Stürzebecher; Claus Elberling; Jochen Müller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don; Mario Cebulla; Ekkehard Stürzebecher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"?

Authors:  M C Killion
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by an insert earphone with equalized frequency response.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don; Sinnet G B Kristensen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Jesse I Gilmer; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Optimizing Parameters for Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response to Quickly Estimate Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Melissa J Polonenko; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Auditory stimulation with music influences the geometric indices of heart rate variability in men.

Authors:  Sheila Ap F da Silva; Heraldo L Guida; Ana M Dos SantosAntônio; Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei; Lucas L Ferreira; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Fernando H Sousa; Vitor E Valenti
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2014-05-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.