Literature DB >> 21110591

A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses.

Claus Elberling1, Manuel Don.   

Abstract

A recent study evaluates auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) evoked by chirps of different durations (sweeping rates) [Elberling et al. (2010). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 215-223]. The study demonstrates that shorter chirps are most efficient at higher levels of stimulation whereas longer chirps are most efficient at lower levels. Mechanisms other than the traveling wave delay, in particular, upward spread of excitation and changes in cochlear-neural delay with level, are suggested to be responsible for these findings. As a consequence, delay models based on estimates of the traveling wave delay are insufficient for the design of chirp stimuli, and another delay model based on a direct approach is therefore proposed. The direct approach uses ABR-latencies from normal-hearing subjects in response to octave-band chirps over a wide range of levels. The octave-band chirps are constructed by decomposing a broad-band chirp, and constitute a subset of the chirp. The delay compensations of the proposed model are similar to those found in the previous experimental study, which thus verifies the results of the proposed model.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110591      PMCID: PMC3003724          DOI: 10.1121/1.3489111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluating auditory brainstem responses to different chirp stimuli at three levels of stimulation.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Johannes Callø; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses.

Authors:  M Don; C Elberling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  M P Gorga; J R Kaminski; K A Beauchaine; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1988-03

5.  Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli.

Authors:  S T Neely; S J Norton; M P Gorga; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Reference data for ABRs in retrocochlear diagnosis.

Authors:  C Elberling; J Parbo
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1987

7.  Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak amplitude variability reflects individual differences in cochlear response times.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference.

Authors:  C Elberling; O Wahlgreen
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1985

9.  The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; B Kwong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Searching for the optimal stimulus eliciting auditory brainstem responses in humans.

Authors:  Oliver Fobel; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  27 in total

1.  [On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Sinnet G B Kristensen; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Bo-Chen Wang; Yong Liang; Xiao-Long Liu; Jing Zhao; You-Li Liu; Yan-Fei Li; Wei Zhang; Qi Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by an insert earphone with equalized frequency response.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don; Sinnet G B Kristensen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Band limited chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther; Mario Cebulla
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 7.  [Objective diagnostic methods in pediatric audiology].

Authors:  R Mühler; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Mapping auditory nerve firing density using high-level compound action potentials and high-pass noise masking.

Authors:  Brian R Earl; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns: implementation in clinical routine.

Authors:  David Ulrich Seidel; Tobias Angelo Flemming; Jonas Jae-Hyun Park; Stephan Remmert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.