Literature DB >> 20643386

Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations.

Nancy B Carlisle1, Geoffrey F Woodman.   

Abstract

Theories of visual attention suggest that working memory representations automatically guide attention toward memory-matching objects. Some empirical tests of this prediction have produced results consistent with working memory automatically guiding attention. However, others have shown that individuals can strategically control whether working memory representations guide visual attention. Previous studies have not independently measured automatic and strategic contributions to the interactions between working memory and attention. In this study, we used a classic manipulation of the probability of valid, neutral, and invalid cues to tease apart the nature of such interactions. This framework utilizes measures of reaction time (RT) to quantify the costs and benefits of attending to memory-matching items and infer the relative magnitudes of automatic and strategic effects. We found both costs and benefits even when the memory-matching item was no more likely to be the target than other items, indicating an automatic component of attentional guidance. However, the costs and benefits essentially doubled as the probability of a trial with a valid cue increased from 20% to 80%, demonstrating a potent strategic effect. We also show that the instructions given to participants led to a significant change in guidance distinct from the actual probability of events during the experiment. Together, these findings demonstrate that the influence of working memory representations on attention is driven by both automatic and strategic interactions.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643386      PMCID: PMC2991492          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  22 in total

1.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Dietmar Heinke; Glyn W Humphreys; Manuel J Blanco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.

Authors:  R Houtkamp; P R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Frank Meijer; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Stressing the mind: the effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-07

6.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: recent evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  S J Luck
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  33 in total

1.  How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

5.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

6.  Incidental biasing of attention from visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The benefit of forgetting.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Sang W Hong; Min-Suk Kang; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

8.  Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Cognitive control over prospective task-set interference.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner; David Soto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.