Literature DB >> 17469973

Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?

Geoffrey F Woodman1, Steven J Luck.   

Abstract

In many theories of cognition, researchers propose that working memory and perception operate interactively. For example, in previous studies researchers have suggested that sensory inputs matching the contents of working memory will have an automatic advantage in the competition for processing resources. The authors tested this hypothesis by requiring observers to perform a visual search task while concurrently maintaining object representations in visual working memory. The hypothesis that working memory activation produces a simple but uncontrollable bias signal leads to the prediction that items matching the contents of working memory will automatically capture attention. However, no evidence for automatic attentional capture was obtained; instead, the participants avoided attending to these items. Thus, the contents of working memory can be used in a flexible manner for facilitation or inhibition of processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469973      PMCID: PMC2048820          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  37 in total

1.  What are the units of visual short-term memory, objects or spatial locations?

Authors:  D Lee; M M Chun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.

Authors:  Mieke Donk; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-11

6.  Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.

Authors:  Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-01

7.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention

Authors: 
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  112 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-07-18

4.  Attention to future actions: the influence of instructed S-R versus S-S mappings on attentional control.

Authors:  Helen Tibboel; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-06

5.  How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-12

6.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Interactions between working memory and visual perception: an ERP/EEG study.

Authors:  Yigal Agam; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time.

Authors:  Roos Houtkamp; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-07-30

10.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.