Literature DB >> 29593051

Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Unrelated to the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.

Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez1,2, Almudena Eustaquio-Martín1,2, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda3,2,4.   

Abstract

Sensory systems constantly adapt their responses to the current environment. In hearing, adaptation may facilitate communication in noisy settings, a benefit frequently (but controversially) attributed to the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) enhancing the neural representation of speech. Here, we show that human listeners (N = 14; five male) recognize more words presented monaurally in ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral noise when they are given some time to adapt to the noise. This finding challenges models and theories that claim that speech intelligibility in noise is invariant over time. In addition, we show that this adaptation to the noise occurs also for words processed to maintain the slow-amplitude modulations in speech (the envelope) disregarding the faster fluctuations (the temporal fine structure). This demonstrates that noise adaptation reflects an enhancement of amplitude modulation speech cues and is unaffected by temporal fine structure cues. Last, we show that cochlear implant users (N = 7; four male) show normal monaural adaptation to ipsilateral noise. Because the electrical stimulation delivered by cochlear implants is independent from the MOCR, this demonstrates that noise adaptation does not require the MOCR. We argue that noise adaptation probably reflects adaptation of the dynamic range of auditory neurons to the noise level statistics.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT People find it easier to understand speech in noisy environments when they are given some time to adapt to the noise. This benefit is frequently but controversially attributed to the medial olivocochlear efferent reflex enhancing the representation of speech cues in the auditory nerve. Here, we show that the adaptation to noise reflects an enhancement of the slow fluctuations in amplitude over time that are present in speech. In addition, we show that adaptation to noise for cochlear implant users is not statistically different from that for listeners with normal hearing. Because the electrical stimulation delivered by cochlear implants is independent from the medial olivocochlear efferent reflex, this demonstrates that adaptation to noise does not require this reflex.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/384138-08$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; cochlear implant; envelope; medial olivocochlear reflex; olivocochlear efferents; temporal fine structure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29593051      PMCID: PMC6596031          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0024-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

1.  Temporal envelope expansion of speech in noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: effects on identification performance and response times.

Authors:  F Apoux; O Crouzet; C Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Søren Jørgensen; Stephan D Ewert; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Stimulation of efferent olivocochlear bundle causes release from low level masking.

Authors:  P Nieder; I Nieder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  [Are we sectioning the cochlear efferent system during vestibular neurotomy?].

Authors:  A Chays; S Maison; A Robaglia-Schlupp; P Cau; L Broder; J Magnan
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2003

7.  Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Isabel Dean; Nicol S Harper; David McAlpine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; José L Blanco; Sridhar Kalluri; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Mark E Lutman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; Sridhar Kalluri; José L Blanco; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

2.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Dora Del Pilar Sturla-Carreto; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Understanding degraded speech leads to perceptual gating of a brainstem reflex in human listeners.

Authors:  Heivet Hernández-Pérez; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; David McAlpine; Sumitrajit Dhar; Sriram Boothalingam; Jessica J M Monaghan; Catherine M McMahon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 6.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Listening in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-09-08

8.  Pre-exposure to Lower-Level Noise Mitigates Cochlear Synaptic Loss Induced by High-Level Noise.

Authors:  Liqiang Fan; Zhen Zhang; Hui Wang; Chunyan Li; Yazhi Xing; Shankai Yin; Zhengnong Chen; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.