Literature DB >> 6546751

Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

R Hartmann, G Topp, R Klinke.   

Abstract

Intact and destroyed cat cochleae were electrically stimulated through round window electrodes. Intact cochleae provided information about fiber properties with acoustic stimuli. With sinusoidal currents thresholds for synchronization were 4-68 microA rms. Thresholds were independent of the fiber's characteristic frequencies and thus of their places of origin in the intact cochleae. This shows large current spread. Phase-locking of the responses to electric stimulation was much stronger than it was to acoustic stimulation. Destroyed cochleae had no spontaneous activity and showed even stronger phase-locking. Thresholds obtained using 0.2 ms per phase biphasic pulse stimuli were 60-350 microApp. Action potentials were found to be released with as little as 0.3 ms latency. The neuronal responses to any electric stimulus differed considerably from the responses to corresponding acoustic stimuli. Vestibular fibers were easily activated by electric stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6546751     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90094-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  58 in total

1.  Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

6.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

7.  Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 8.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

9.  Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Tanvi Thakkar; G Christopher Stecker; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.