Literature DB >> 20622888

To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Jennifer A Burr1.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to focus on the ethical issues raised by the removal of anonymity from sperm donors. The increasing currency of a 'right to genetic truth' is clearly visible in the drive to revise the legislation on donor anonymity in Western and European countries. The ethical debate is polarized between the 'right to privacy' of the donor or parent and the 'right to know' of the prospective child. However, it is evident that religious, social and cultural attitudes have an overarching impact on attitudes towards sperm donation generally and anonymity specifically. In Asian countries, the social and cultural heritage is hugely diverse and different from those of the West. This review considers the research exploring the complexity of ethical issues informing this debate, and argues that parent's decisions to reveal donor insemination origins to their children are highly complex and relate to a range of social and cultural attitudes that have not been addressed within the policy to remove anonymity from sperm donors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20622888      PMCID: PMC3739075          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  34 in total

Review 1.  The 'double track' policy for donor anonymity.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development.

Authors:  A Brewaeys
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 3.  Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate.

Authors:  L Frith
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development.

Authors:  S Golombok; A Brewaeys; R Cook; M T Giavazzi; D Guerra; A Mantovani; E van Hall; P G Crosignani; S Dexeus
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation?

Authors:  F Shenfield; S J Steele
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The (ir)relevance of genetics: engendering parallel worlds of procreation and reproduction.

Authors:  Victoria M Grace; Ken R Daniels
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2007-07

7.  The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor (AID) programmes.

Authors:  R Rowland
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: the nature of couples' decision-making.

Authors:  K R Daniels; G M Lewis; W Gillett
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Identifiable semen donors--attitudes of donors and recipient couples.

Authors:  A Purdie; J C Peek; R Irwin; J Ellis; F M Graham; P R Fisher
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1992-02-12

10.  Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children.

Authors:  J Burr; P Reynolds
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sperm donation and its application in China: a 7-year multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Ping Ping; Wen-Bing Zhu; Xin-Zong Zhang; Yu-Shan Li; Quan-Xian Wang; Xiao-Rong Cao; Yong Liu; Hui-Li Dai; Yi-Ran Huang; Zheng Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  The ethical, legal, and social issues impacted by modern assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; Yulian Zhao
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-01-04

3.  Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample.

Authors:  David J Walsh; E Scott Sills; Gary S Collins; Christine A Hawrylyshyn; Piotr Sokol; Anthony Ph Walsh
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2013-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.