Literature DB >> 4049010

The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor (AID) programmes.

R Rowland.   

Abstract

The assumption that secrecy is of paramount importance in AID programmes has arisen in order to protect the three parties involved: donor, recipient couple and offspring. Due to the uncertain legal position, he medical profession has also been concerned to protect itself against possible litigation. Recent calls for an abolition of all secrecy have been motivated by the knowledge and experience of workers in the field of adoption. The similarities and differences between adoption and AID as ways of creating a family are discussed, with the resulting conclusion that, although the two have much in common they do present different experiences and problems for parents and offspring. The experiences of donors and recipient couples are then discussed based on data gathered to date from 67 donors and 93 couples in an AID programme at the Melbourne Family Medical Centre. It is stressed that many statements in the past regarding secrecy have not been informed by the opinions and intentions of participants themselves, and further information is needed in this area. Furthermore, it is clear that all members of a society are affected by the codes of secrecy currently operating and the 'rights' of all members of that society need to be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4049010     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90219-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  Human fertilisation and embryology bill.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-30

2.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?

Authors:  Damian H Adams
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?

Authors:  Irene Riezzo; Margherita Neri; Stefania Bello; Cristoforo Pomara; Emanuela Turillazzi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.