Literature DB >> 9455865

The 'double track' policy for donor anonymity.

G Pennings1.   

Abstract

Although there is no evidence that any one policy is the best solution, clinics as well as legislators tend to impose one position about donor anonymity on all participants. The most evident alternative policy is to let the parties decide for themselves. Donors may choose between anonymity or identification and recipients can opt for an anonymous or identifiable donor. This 'double track' policy for anonymity represents the best attempt to balance the rights of donors, recipients and donor offspring. The procedure reflects the plurality of visions and the absence of an independent standard to decide which one is best.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9455865     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  4 in total

1.  The reduction of sperm donor candidates due to the abolition of the anonymity rule: analysis of an argument.

Authors:  P Guido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Authors:  Natacha Salomé Lima
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Legalizing altruistic surrogacy in response to evasive travel? An Icelandic proposal.

Authors:  Sigurður Kristinsson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2017-02-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.