Literature DB >> 18375682

Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children.

J Burr1, P Reynolds.   

Abstract

The issue of genetic inheritance, and particularly the contradictory rights of donors, recipients and donor offspring as to the disclosure of donor identities, is ethically complicated. Donors, donor offspring and parents of donor offspring may appeal to individual rights for confidentiality or disclosure within legal systems based on liberal rights discourse. This paper explores the ethical issues of non-disclosure of genetic inheritance by contrasting two principle models used to articulate the problem--liberal and communitarian ethical models. It argues that whilst the latter provides a more constructive avenue to providing an ethics for donation than the competing and contradictory positions represented in a liberal rights approach, it raises issues of ethical judgement and authority that remain problematic. This ethical discussion is supported by a field study, funded by the Wellcome Trust, exploring the perceptions and experiences of recipients of donor sperm and their partners towards donor anonymity. The field study provides the empirical basis of an argument for making ethical judgements on the grounds of the community good rather than individual rights, that nevertheless recognises that both are inherently problematic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375682     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.020412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  The risks of absolute medical confidentiality.

Authors:  M A Crook
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Secondary use of empirical research data in medical ethics papers on gamete donation: forms of use and pitfalls.

Authors:  Veerle Provoost
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

3.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Should there be a female age limit on public funding for assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Drew Carter; Amber M Watt; Annette Braunack-Mayer; Adam G Elshaug; John R Moss; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Application of iPS in assisted reproductive technology: sperm from somatic cells?

Authors:  Lin Yao; Xiya Yu; Ning Hui; Shanrong Liu
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Attitudes toward oocyte donation among medical and nursing students and couples who have recently become parents: A Swedish study.

Authors:  Gunilla Sydsjö; Sofia Nevander; Sara Norman; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.