Literature DB >> 7610427

Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: the nature of couples' decision-making.

K R Daniels1, G M Lewis, W Gillett.   

Abstract

The issue of openness and secrecy in the use of donor gametes is the subject of considerable disagreement and debate, not only for social scientists and health professionals, but also for the recipients of donor gametes. This paper has its origins in a study of 58 couples who had a child/children as a result of donor insemination (DI) at the Dunedin Infertility Clinic. Respondents completed questionnaires and took part in an interview during which they were asked whether they intended to tell their offspring about their DI conception. The nature of agreement/disagreement between partners on this issue, the dynamics operating between couples that may affect decision-making, and the views of couples in a time-frame perspective are the focus of this paper. Transcripts from some of the interviews are presented to illustrate the points made and commentary and discussion is provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7610427     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00251-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

1.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes.

Authors:  Kirstin Mac Dougall; Gay Becker; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

4.  Preference for anonymity in sperm donation for artificial insemination: an experience from low-resource settings in Nigeria.

Authors:  Euzebus Chinonye Ezugwu; George U Eleje; Chukwuemeka A Iyoke; Sunday G Mba; Henry C Nnaji; Chukwunonso I Enechukwu; Peter O Nkwo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.

Authors:  S Isaksson; G Sydsjö; A Skoog Svanberg; C Lampic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Parenting stress and its association with perceived agreement about the disclosure decision in parents following donor conception.

Authors:  Anja J Gebhardt; Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Astrid Indekeu; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman; Sophie Zadeh; Venessa Smith; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France.

Authors:  N Kalampalikis; M Doumergue; S Zadeh
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.