Literature DB >> 8943550

The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development.

S Golombok1, A Brewaeys, R Cook, M T Giavazzi, D Guerra, A Mantovani, E van Hall, P G Crosignani, S Dexeus.   

Abstract

Findings are presented of a European study (conducted in the UK, Italy, Spain and The Netherlands) of family relationships and the social and emotional development of children in families created as a result of the two most widely used reproductive technologies, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and donor insemination (DI), in comparison with control groups of families with naturally conceived child and adoptive families. Mothers of children conceived by assisted reproduction expressed greater warmth towards their child, were more emotionally involved with their child, interacted more with their child and reported less stress associated with parenting than mothers who conceived their child naturally. Similarly, assisted reproduction fathers were found to interact more with their child and to contribute more to parenting than fathers with a naturally conceived child. With respect to the children themselves, no group differences were found for either the presence of psychological disorder or for children's perceptions of the quality of family relationships. The findings relating to the quality of parenting and the socio-emotional development of the children were similar in each of the four countries studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8943550     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  Do fertile and infertile people think differently about ovum donation?

Authors:  L Urdapilleta; C Chillik; D Fernández
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

3.  Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: a clash of interest, of duties, or an exercise in responsibility?

Authors:  E Shenfield
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Parenting and secrecy issues related to children of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  S Golombok
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

7.  Gestational Surrogacy: Current View.

Authors:  Justo Aznar; Miriam Martínez Peris
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-04-09

8.  Psychomotor development of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis and parental stress evaluation.

Authors:  Loretta Thomaidis; Sophia Kitsiou-Tzeli; Elena Critselis; Hera Drandakis; Vassiliki Touliatou; Stelios Mantoudis; Eleni Leze; Aspasia Destouni; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos; Dimitrios Kafetzis; Emmanouel Kanavakis
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 9.  An overview of studies on psychological well-being in children born following assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Qi-tao Zhan; Pei-pei Pan; Xiang-rong Xu; Hang-ying Lou; Yi-yun Lou; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: a follow-up over 10 years.

Authors:  L Blake; V Jadva; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.