Literature DB >> 8860881

Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development.

A Brewaeys1.   

Abstract

The practice of donor insemination (DI) has undergone major changes in the past 20 years. Attention was paid to the long-term psychological effects, the pleas for openness became stronger over the years and the use of anonymous donors became subject to public debate in several countries. The present article reviews what empirical research there is into DI families and their children. Over the years follow up studies have appeared sporadically and in spite of the varying quality of the research methods, preliminary findings have emerged. Research into the confidentiality issue in DI couples revealed that 47-92% of the DI parents intended to keep the donor origin secret from their children. DI couples just starting treatment more often intended to tell their children the DI origin than those who already had children. It is, however, too early to tell whether the public pleas for more openness did affect attitudes of the DI patients themselves. Research into the psychological well-being of DI parents and children failed to reveal major psychological problems. DI parents appeared to be well adjusted and to have stable marital relationships. DI children did not show significantly more emotional disturbances than controls. The quality of the parent-child relationship was better in the DI group than in the controls of naturally conceived parents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8860881     DOI: 10.3109/01674829609025658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  7 in total

1.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

2.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes.

Authors:  Kirstin Mac Dougall; Gay Becker; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Authors:  Natacha Salomé Lima
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Kirby Adlam; Alana D Steffen; Martha Driessnack; Harold D Grotevant; Susan C Klock; Lauri Pasch; Valerie Gruss
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2022-07-31

6.  Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Louise Johnson; Kate Bourne; Jane Fisher; Maggie Kirkman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Process and Pitfalls of Sperm Cryopreservation.

Authors:  Hamoun Rozati; Thomas Handley; Channa N Jayasena
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.