Literature DB >> 30187441

The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Elizabeth J Saccone1, Philippe A Chouinard2.   

Abstract

Research into weight illusions has provided valuable insight into the functioning of the human perceptual system. Associations between the weight of an object and its other features, such as its size, material, density, conceptual information, or identity, influence our expectations and perceptions of weight. Earlier accounts of weight illusions underscored the importance of previous interactions with objects in the formation of these associations. In this review, we propose a theory that the influence of size on weight perception could be driven by innate and phylogenetically older mechanisms, and that it is therefore more deep-seated than the effects of other features that influence our perception of an object's weight. To do so, we first consider the different associations that exist between the weight of an object and its other features and discuss how different object features influence weight perception in different weight illusions. After this, we consider the cognitive, neurological, and developmental evidence, highlighting the uniqueness of size-weight associations and how they might be reinforced rather than driven by experience alone. In the process, we propose a novel neuroanatomical account of how size might influence weight perception differently than other object features do.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor planning/programming; Visual perception; Weight illusions; Weight perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30187441     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1519-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  64 in total

1.  Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch.

Authors:  E L Amazeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  A theory of cortical responses.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Jennifer P Bittner; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Towards an understanding of the role of the 'magnocellular advantage' in fluent reading.

Authors:  Robin Laycock; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Felt heaviness is used to perceive the affordance for throwing but rotational inertia does not affect either.

Authors:  Qin Zhu; Kevin Shockley; Michael A Riley; Michael T Tolston; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Mueller-Lyer illusion: effect of age, lightness contrast, and hue.

Authors:  R H Pollack
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Size constancy in infants: 4-month-olds' responses to physical versus retinal image size.

Authors:  Carl E Granrud
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The Size-Weight Illusion is not anti-Bayesian after all: a unifying Bayesian account.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Wei Ji Ma; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  7 in total

1.  Low-level sensory processes play a more crucial role than high-level cognitive ones in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Cody G Freeman; Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  When Does One Decide How Heavy an Object Feels While Picking It Up?

Authors:  Myrthe A Plaisier; Irene A Kuling; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27

3.  Influence of visually perceived shape and brightness on perceived size, expected weight, and perceived weight of 3D objects.

Authors:  Michele Vicovaro; Katia Ruta; Giulio Vidotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Examining Whether Semantic Cues Can Affect Felt Heaviness When Lifting Novel Objects.

Authors:  Caitlin Elisabeth Naylor; T J Power; Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2020-01-31

5.  The effects of TMS over the anterior intraparietal area on anticipatory fingertip force scaling and the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Vonne van Polanen; Gavin Buckingham; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Effect on Perceived Weight of Object Shapes.

Authors:  Taebeum Ryu; Jaehyun Park; Olga Vl Bitkina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Overt and Covert Object Features Mediate Timing of Patterned Brain Activity during Motor Planning.

Authors:  Michelle Marneweck; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-10-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.