Literature DB >> 24691760

Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Gavin Buckingham1.   

Abstract

Weight illusions--where one object feels heavier than an identically weighted counterpart--have been the focus of many recent scientific investigations. The most famous of these illusions is the 'size-weight illusion', where a small object feels heavier than an identically weighted, but otherwise similar-looking, larger object. There are, however, a variety of similar illusions which can be induced by varying other stimulus properties, such as surface material, temperature, colour, and even shape. Despite well over 100 years of research, there is little consensus about the mechanisms underpinning these illusions. In this review, I will first provide an overview of the weight illusions that have been described. I will then outline the dominant theories that have emerged over the past decade for why we consistently misperceive the weights of objects which vary in size, with a particular focus on the role of lifters' expectations of heaviness. Finally, I will discuss the magnitude of the various weight illusions and suggest how this largely overlooked facet of the topic might resolve some of the debates surrounding the cause of these misperceptions of heaviness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24691760     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3926-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  D J Murray; R R Ellis; C A Bandomir; H E Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-11

2.  The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; A H Murray
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Why Barbie feels heavier than Ken: the influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the illusory perception of weight.

Authors:  Anton J M Dijker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-06-27

Review 5.  Perceptual learning: inverting the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The golf-ball illusion: evidence for top-down processing in weight perception.

Authors:  R R Ellis; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Characterization of the Haptic Shape-Weight Illusion with 3D Objects.

Authors:  M Kahrimanovic; Wouters Bergmann Tiest; A Kappers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Alterations in perceived heaviness during digital anaesthesia.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey; E K Potter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mass is all that matters in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Myrthe A Plaisier; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  35 in total

1.  Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action and perception.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Gavin Buckingham; James T Enns; Philippe A Chouinard; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Stability of Kinesthetic Perception in Efferent-Afferent Spaces: The Concept of Iso-perceptual Manifold.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Distinct contributions of explicit and implicit memory processes to weight prediction when lifting objects and judging their weights: an aging study.

Authors:  Kevin M Trewartha; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Cognitive attribution of the source of an error in object-lifting results in differences in motor generalization.

Authors:  Kelene Fercho; Lee A Baugh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Preserved Object Weight Processing after Bilateral Lateral Occipital Complex Lesions.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Desiree Holler; Elizabeth E Michelakakis; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Michele Vicovaro
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-02-05

9.  Illusory visual-depth reversal can modulate sensations of contact surface.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Keiko Omori; Tetsuya Arai; Yasunori Aizawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Is 'heavy' up or down? Testing the vertical spatial representation of weight.

Authors:  Michele Vicovaro; Mario Dalmaso
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.