Literature DB >> 24737065

The role of expectancies in the size-weight illusion: a review of theoretical and empirical arguments and a new explanation.

Anton J M Dijker1.   

Abstract

The size-weight illusion (SWI) refers to the phenomenon that objects that are objectively equal in weight but different in size or volume are perceived to differ in weight, such that smaller objects feel heavier than larger ones. This article reviews studies trying to support three different viewpoints with respect to the role of expectancies in causing the SWI. The first viewpoint argues for a crucial role; the second admits a role, yet without seeing consequences for sensorimotor processes; and the third denies any causal role for expectancies at all. A new explanation of the SWI is proposed that can integrate the different arguments. A distinctive feature of the new explanation is that it recognizes the causal influence of expectancies, yet combines this with certain reactive and direct behavioral consequences of perceiving size differences that are independent of experience-based expectancies, and that normally result in the adaptive application of forces to lift or handle differently sized objects. The new account explains why the illusion is associated with the repeated generation of inappropriate lifting forces (which can, however, be modified through extensive training), as well as why it depends on continuous visual exposure to size cues, appears at an early age, and is cognitively impenetrable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24737065     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0634-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  45 in total

1.  Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Jennifer P Bittner; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Perceptual learning: inverting the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Neural gain changes subserving perceptual acuity.

Authors:  L F Jones; P R Burgess
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  When is a weight not illusory?

Authors:  H E Ross
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  A weight illusion produced by lifting movements.

Authors:  C M Davis; M Taylor; P Brickett
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1977-02

8.  The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  R R Ellis; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

Review 9.  Extracting object properties through haptic exploration.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1993-10

10.  The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  The number-weight illusion.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Dennis Reike
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Michele Vicovaro
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-02-05

4.  A mass-density model can account for the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Knut Drewing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The impact of using an upper-limb prosthesis on the perception of real and illusory weight differences.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Johnny Parr; Greg Wood; Samuel Vine; Pan Dimitriou; Sarah Day
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

6.  Low-level sensory processes play a more crucial role than high-level cognitive ones in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Cody G Freeman; Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Memory influences haptic perception of softness.

Authors:  Anna Metzger; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Influence of visually perceived shape and brightness on perceived size, expected weight, and perceived weight of 3D objects.

Authors:  Michele Vicovaro; Katia Ruta; Giulio Vidotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Examining Whether Semantic Cues Can Affect Felt Heaviness When Lifting Novel Objects.

Authors:  Caitlin Elisabeth Naylor; T J Power; Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2020-01-31

10.  The size-weight illusion is unimpaired in individuals with a history of congenital visual deprivation.

Authors:  Rashi Pant; Maria J S Guerreiro; Pia Ley; Davide Bottari; Idris Shareef; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.