Literature DB >> 20596841

Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Ran Klein1, Rob S B Beanlands, Robert A deKemp.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20596841     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-010-9256-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  55 in total

1.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.

Authors:  R Boellaard; A van Lingen; A A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging with PET and (82)Rb on downstream invasive procedure utilization, costs, and outcomes in coronary disease management.

Authors:  Michael E Merhige; William J Breen; Victoria Shelton; Teresa Houston; Brian J D'Arcy; Anthony F Perna
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Factor analysis for extraction of blood time-activity curves in dynamic FDG-PET studies.

Authors:  H M Wu; C K Hoh; Y Choi; H R Schelbert; R A Hawkins; M E Phelps; S C Huang
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. I. Measurement of extraction fraction and flow with external detectors.

Authors:  N A Mullani; R A Goldstein; K L Gould; S K Marani; D J Fisher; H A O'Brien; M D Loberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Chietsugu Katoh; Kazuyuki Noriyasu; Yasuyoshi Iwado; Hideto Furuyama; Yoshinori Ito; Yuji Kuge; Tetsuro Kohya; Akira Kitabatake; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Comparison of cost-effectiveness and utility of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and coronary angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R E Patterson; R L Eisner; S F Horowitz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Rubidium-82 PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow: validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Riikka Lautamäki; Richard T George; Kakuya Kitagawa; Takahiro Higuchi; Jennifer Merrill; Corina Voicu; Anthony DiPaula; Stephan G Nekolla; João A C Lima; Albert C Lardo; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O.

Authors:  S R Bergmann; K A Fox; A L Rand; K D McElvany; M J Welch; J Markham; B E Sobel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952
View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kolthammer; Kuan-Hao Su; Anu Grover; Manoj Narayanan; David W Jordan; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Assessment of coronary endothelial function using PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Osamu Manabe; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Csilla Celeng; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  New PET system permits reliable estimates of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve.

Authors:  Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Myocardial Creep: we can now look it in the eye without framewise PET-CT registration for myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  Elia von Felten; Andreas A Giannopoulos
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.